Differences between rural and urban prostate cancer patients

Background We hypothesized that the residency status (rural area [RA] vs urban clusters [UC] vs urban areas [UA]) affects stage and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in contemporary newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) patients of all stages, regardless of treatment. Methods Newly diagnosed PCa patie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of urology 2021-07, Vol.39 (7), p.2507-2514
Hauptverfasser: Stolzenbach, Lara Franziska, Deuker, Marina, Collà-Ruvolo, Claudia, Nocera, Luigi, Tian, Zhe, Maurer, Tobias, Tilki, Derya, Briganti, Alberto, Saad, Fred, Mirone, Vincenzo, Chun, Felix K. H., Graefen, Markus, Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background We hypothesized that the residency status (rural area [RA] vs urban clusters [UC] vs urban areas [UA]) affects stage and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in contemporary newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) patients of all stages, regardless of treatment. Methods Newly diagnosed PCa patients with available residency status were abstracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004–2016). Propensity-score (PS) matching, cumulative incidence plots, multivariate competing-risks regression (CRR) models were used. Results Of 531,468 PCa patients of all stages, 6653 (1.3%) resided in RA, 50,932 (9.6%) in UC and 473,883 (89.2%) in UA. No statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in stage at presentation or CSM were recorded. Conversely, 10-year other cause-mortality (OCM) rates were 27.2% vs 23.7% vs 18.9% ( p  
ISSN:0724-4983
1433-8726
DOI:10.1007/s00345-020-03483-7