Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Prevalence Meta-Analysis

To analyze the prevalence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of HRD in PDAC from PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases, and online cancer genomic data set...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical oncology 2021-08, Vol.39 (23), p.2617-2631
Hauptverfasser: Casolino, Raffaella, Paiella, Salvatore, Azzolina, Danila, Beer, Philip A, Corbo, Vincenzo, Lorenzoni, Giulia, Gregori, Dario, Golan, Talia, Braconi, Chiara, Froeling, Fieke E M, Milella, Michele, Scarpa, Aldo, Pea, Antonio, Malleo, Giuseppe, Salvia, Roberto, Bassi, Claudio, Chang, David K, Biankin, Andrew V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To analyze the prevalence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of HRD in PDAC from PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases, and online cancer genomic data sets. The main outcome was pooled prevalence of somatic and germline mutations in the better characterized HRD genes ( , , , , , , , and the genes). The secondary outcomes were prevalence of germline mutations overall, and in sporadic and familial cases; prevalence of germline mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ); and prevalence of HRD based on other definitions (ie, alterations in other genes, genomic scars, and mutational signatures). Random-effects modeling with the Freeman-Tukey transformation was used for the analyses. PROSPERO registration number: (CRD42020190813). Sixty studies with 21,842 participants were included in the systematic review and 57 in the meta-analysis. Prevalence of germline and somatic mutations was : 0.9%, : 3.5%, : 0.2%, : 2.2%, : 0.3%, : 0.5%, : 0.0%, and : 0.1%. Prevalence of germline mutations was : 0.9% (2.4% in AJ), : 3.8% (8.2% in AJ), : 0.2%, : 2%, : 0.3%, and : 0.4%. No significant differences between sporadic and familial cases were identified. HRD prevalence ranged between 14.5%-16.5% through targeted next-generation sequencing and 24%-44% through whole-genome or whole-exome sequencing allowing complementary genomic analysis, including genomic scars and other signatures (surrogate markers of HRD). Surrogate readouts of HRD identify a greater proportion of patients with HRD than analyses limited to gene-level approaches. There is a clear need to harmonize HRD definitions and to validate the optimal biomarker for treatment selection. Universal HRD screening including integrated somatic and germline analysis should be offered to all patients with PDAC.
ISSN:0732-183X
1527-7755
1527-7755
DOI:10.1200/JCO.20.03238