Clinical relevance of partial HPV16/18 genotyping in stratifying HPV‐positive women attending routine cervical cancer screening: a population‐based cohort study

Objective To evaluate partial HPV16/18 genotyping as a possible biomarker to select women attending HPV‐based cervical cancer screening at higher risk to be referred to colposcopy. Design Population‐based cohort study. Setting Organised cervical cancer screening programmes (Italy). Population Women...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2021-07, Vol.128 (8), p.1353-1362
Hauptverfasser: Gori, S, Battagello, J, Gustinucci, D, Campari, C, Zorzi, M, Frayle, H, Passamonti, B, Sartori, G, Bulletti, S, Fodero, C, Cesarini, E, Faggiano, R, Del Mistro, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To evaluate partial HPV16/18 genotyping as a possible biomarker to select women attending HPV‐based cervical cancer screening at higher risk to be referred to colposcopy. Design Population‐based cohort study. Setting Organised cervical cancer screening programmes (Italy). Population Women with high‐risk HPV infection (period: 2015–2019). Methods We analysed the association between partial HPV16/18 genotyping, cytology triage and histologically confirmed diagnosis of high‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN3+) lesions. Main outcome measures Detection rate (DR) and positive predictive value (PPV) for histologically confirmed CIN3+ (any episode in the 2 years after baseline); sensitivity for CIN3+ and number of colposcopies needed for lesion detection. Results The study included 145 437 women screened with HPV testing by the clinically validated COBAS 4800 HPV assay (Roche). Overall, 9601 (6.6%) women were HPV+ at baseline; HPV16 and HPV18 were present in 1865 and 594 samples, respectively. The cumulative (baseline plus 1‐year repeat) cytology positivity was 42.8% and high‐grade cytology was significantly higher (P 
ISSN:1470-0328
1471-0528
DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.16631