Impact of isolation method on cellular activation and presence of specific tendon cell subpopulations during in vitro culture

Tendon injuries are common and heal poorly, due in part to a lack of understanding of fundamental tendon cell biology. A major impediment to the study of tendon cells is the absence of robust, well‐characterized in vitro models. Unlike other tissue systems, current tendon cell models do not account...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The FASEB journal 2021-07, Vol.35 (7), p.e21733-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Nichols, Anne E. C., Muscat, Samantha N., Miller, Sarah E., Green, Luke J., Richards, Michael S., Loiselle, Alayna E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Tendon injuries are common and heal poorly, due in part to a lack of understanding of fundamental tendon cell biology. A major impediment to the study of tendon cells is the absence of robust, well‐characterized in vitro models. Unlike other tissue systems, current tendon cell models do not account for how differences in isolation methodology may affect the activation state of tendon cells or the presence of various tendon cell subpopulations. The objective of this study was to characterize how common isolation methods affect the behavior, fate, and lineage composition of tendon cell cultures. Tendon cells isolated by explant exhibited reduced proliferative capacity, decreased expression of tendon marker genes, and increased expression of genes associated with fibroblast activation compared to digested cells. Consistently, explanted cells also displayed an increased propensity to differentiate to myofibroblasts compared to digested cells. Explanted cultures from multiple different tendons were substantially enriched for the presence of scleraxis‐lineage (Scx‐lin+) cells compared to digested cultures, while the overall percentage of S100a4‐lineage (S100a4‐lin+) cells was dependent on both isolation method and tendon of origin. Neither isolation methods preserved the ratios of Scx‐lin+ or S100a4‐lin+ to non‐lineage cells seen in tendons in vivo. Combined, these data indicate that further refinement of in vitro cultures models is required in order to more accurately understand the effects of various stimuli on tendon cell behavior. Statement of clinical significance: The development of informed in vitro tendon cell models will facilitate enhanced screening of potential therapeutic candidates to improve tendon healing.
ISSN:0892-6638
1530-6860
DOI:10.1096/fj.202100405R