Five-Category Intelligent Auxiliary Diagnosis Model of Common Fundus Diseases Based on Fundus Images

PurposeThe discrepancy of the number between ophthalmologists and patients in China is large. Retinal vein occlusion (RVO), high myopia, glaucoma, and diabetic retinopathy (DR) are common fundus diseases. Therefore, in this study, a five-category intelligent auxiliary diagnosis model for common fund...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Translational vision science & technology 2021-06, Vol.10 (7), p.20-20
Hauptverfasser: Zheng, Bo, Jiang, Qin, Lu, Bing, He, Kai, Wu, Mao-Nian, Hao, Xiu-Lan, Zhou, Hong-Xia, Zhu, Shao-Jun, Yang, Wei-Hua
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:PurposeThe discrepancy of the number between ophthalmologists and patients in China is large. Retinal vein occlusion (RVO), high myopia, glaucoma, and diabetic retinopathy (DR) are common fundus diseases. Therefore, in this study, a five-category intelligent auxiliary diagnosis model for common fundus diseases is proposed; the model's area of focus is marked. MethodsA total of 2000 fundus images were collected; 3 different 5-category intelligent auxiliary diagnosis models for common fundus diseases were trained via different transfer learning and image preprocessing techniques. A total of 1134 fundus images were used for testing. The clinical diagnostic results were compared with the diagnostic results. The main evaluation indicators included sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), 95% confidence interval (CI), kappa, and accuracy. The interpretation methods were used to obtain the model's area of focus in the fundus image. ResultsThe accuracy rates of the 3 intelligent auxiliary diagnosis models on the 1134 fundus images were all above 90%, the kappa values were all above 88%, the diagnosis consistency was good, and the AUC approached 0.90. For the 4 common fundus diseases, the best results of sensitivity, specificity, and F1-scores of the 3 models were 88.27%, 97.12%, and 84.02%; 89.94%, 99.52%, and 93.90%; 95.24%, 96.43%, and 85.11%; and 88.24%, 98.21%, and 89.55%, respectively. ConclusionsThis study designed a five-category intelligent auxiliary diagnosis model for common fundus diseases. It can be used to obtain the diagnostic category of fundus images and the model's area of focus. Translational RelevanceThis study will help the primary doctors to provide effective services to all ophthalmologic patients.
ISSN:2164-2591
2164-2591
DOI:10.1167/tvst.10.7.20