Business as unusual: medical oncology services adapt and deliver during COVID‐19

Background The COVID‐19 pandemic has challenged cancer care globally, introducing resource limitations and competing risks into clinical practice. Aims To describe the COVID‐19 impact on medical oncology care provision in an Australian setting. Methods Calvary Mater Newcastle and Newcastle Private H...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Internal medicine journal 2021-05, Vol.51 (5), p.673-681
Hauptverfasser: Travers, Avraham, Adler, Kim, Blanchard, Gillian, Bonaventura, Tony, Charlton, Julie, Day, Fiona, Healey, Laura, Kim, Sang, Lombard, Janine, Mallesara, Girish, Mandaliya, Hiren, Navani, Vishal, Nordman, Ina, Paterson, Robin, Plowman, Louise, Quah, Gaik Tin, Scalley, Michael, Shrestha, Prajwol, Tailor, Bharti, Westhuizen, Andre, Zhang, Betty, Gedye, Craig, Lynam, James
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The COVID‐19 pandemic has challenged cancer care globally, introducing resource limitations and competing risks into clinical practice. Aims To describe the COVID‐19 impact on medical oncology care provision in an Australian setting. Methods Calvary Mater Newcastle and Newcastle Private Hospital medical oncology data from 1 February to 31 April 2019 versus 2020 were retrospectively analysed. Results Three hundred and sixty‐four inpatient admissions occurred in 2020, 21% less than in 2019. Total inpatient days decreased by 22% (2842 vs 2203). April was most impacted (36% and 44% fewer admissions and inpatient days respectively). Mean length of stay remained unchanged (6.4 vs 6.2 days, P = 0.7). In all, 5072 outpatient consultations were conducted, including 417 new‐patient consultations (4% and 6% increase on 2019 respectively). Telephone consultations (0 vs 1380) replaced one‐quarter of face‐to‐face consultations (4859 vs 3623, −25%), with minimal telehealth use (6 vs 69). Day Treatment Centre encounters remained stable (3751 vs 3444, −8%). The proportion of new patients planned for palliative treatment decreased (35% vs 28%, P = 0.04), observation increased (16% vs 23%, P = 0.04) and curative intent treatment was unchanged (both 41%). Recruiting clinical trials decreased by one‐third (45 vs 30), two trials were activated (vs 5 in 2019) and 45% fewer patients consented to trial participation (62 vs 34). Conclusion Our medical oncology teams adapted rapidly to COVID‐19 with significant changes to care provision, including fewer hospital admissions, a notable transition to telephone‐based outpatient clinics and reduced clinical trial activity. The continuum of care was largely defended despite pandemic considerations and growing service volumes.
ISSN:1444-0903
1445-5994
DOI:10.1111/imj.15217