COVID diagnostics by molecular methods: A systematic review of nucleic acid based testing systems

The selection of appropriate kit and PCR equipment for the detection of SARS CoV-2 is critically important in view of many options available in the diagnostic market. Since last year many molecular products are available for COVID-19 diagnostics., some of these diagnostics have become commercially a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Indian journal of medical microbiology 2021-07, Vol.39 (3), p.271-278
Hauptverfasser: Das, Parijat, Mondal, Sudipto, Pal, Soumik, Roy, Samadrita, Vidyadharan, Anju, Dadwal, Rajneesh, Bhattacharya, Sanjay, Mishra, Deepak Kumar, Chandy, Mammen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The selection of appropriate kit and PCR equipment for the detection of SARS CoV-2 is critically important in view of many options available in the diagnostic market. Since last year many molecular products are available for COVID-19 diagnostics., some of these diagnostics have become commercially available for healthcare workers and clinical laboratories. However, the diagnostic technologies have specific limitations and reported several false-positive and false-negative cases, especially during the early stages of kit development and use. The current article addresses these and other relevant questions important to the medical microbiologists running or aspiring to run COVID diagnostic services using PCR and related technologies. In this Systematic Review we follow Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA). A total of 258 citations retrieved, among those 77 peer reviewed articles was assessed for eligibility, and 181 studies were excluded. Based on inclusion criteria final data extraction was done. The question of diagnostic dilemma has also been addressed in view of discordant results between assays, inter-test variability, repeat testing requirements in specific settings and inconclusive or indeterminate results. Kit efficiency was satisfactory for all assays and the estimates varied within sample types and technology. Using clinical samples, we observed some variations in detection rate between kits. Importantly, none of the assays showed cross-reactivity with other respiratory (corona) viruses, except as expected for the SARS-CoV-1 E-gene. We conclude SARS CoV-2 related molecular assays differed considerably in performance. Hence we need to understand importance of molecular diagnostics test interpretation in light of the latest pandemic virus.
ISSN:0255-0857
1998-3646
DOI:10.1016/j.ijmmb.2021.05.012