Pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide (OPTIMISMM): outcomes by prior treatment at first relapse
In the phase 3 OPTIMISMM trial, pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd) demonstrated superior efficacy vs bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide, including those refractory to lenalidomide. This analys...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Leukemia 2021-06, Vol.35 (6), p.1722-1731 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In the phase 3 OPTIMISMM trial, pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd) demonstrated superior efficacy vs bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide, including those refractory to lenalidomide. This analysis evaluated outcomes in patients at first relapse (
N
= 226) by lenalidomide-refractory status, prior bortezomib exposure, and prior stem cell transplant (SCT). Second-line PVd significantly improved PFS vs Vd in lenalidomide-refractory (17.8 vs 9.5 months;
P
= 0.0276) and lenalidomide-nonrefractory patients (22.0 vs 12.0 months;
P
= 0.0491), patients with prior bortezomib (17.8 vs 12.0 months;
P
= 0.0068), and patients with (22.0 vs 13.8 months;
P
= 0.0241) or without (16.5 vs 9.5 months;
P
= 0.0454) prior SCT. In patients without prior bortezomib, median PFS was 20.7 vs 9.5 months (
P
= 0.1055). Significant improvement in overall response rate was also observed with PVd vs Vd in lenalidomide-refractory (85.9% vs 50.8%;
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0887-6924 1476-5551 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41375-020-01021-3 |