Differences in Rupture Patterns and Associated Lesions Related to Traumatic Distal Triceps Tendon Rupture Between Outstretched Hand and Direct Injuries

Traumatic distal triceps tendon rupture results in substantial disability in the absence of an appropriate diagnosis and treatment. To the best of our knowledge, differences in the degree of injury according to the injury mechanisms and associated lesions are not well known. In this study, we asked: (1) What differences are seen in triceps tear patterns between indirect injuries (fall on an outstretched hand) and direct injuries? (2) What are the associated elbow and soft tissue injuries seen in indirect and direct triceps ruptures? Between 2006 and 2017, one center treated 73 elbows of 72 patients for distal triceps tendon rupture. Of those, 70% (51 of 73 elbows) was excluded from this study; 8% (6 of 73) were related to systemic diseases, 59% (43 of 73) sustained open injuries, and 3% (2 of 73) were related to local steroid injections. We retrospectively collected data on traumatic distal triceps tendon rupture in 30% (22 of 73) of elbows at a single trauma center during a 10-year period. A fall on an outstretched hand was the cause of injury in 15 patients and direct blow by object or contusion were the cause in seven. MRI and surgery were performed in all patients. Traumatic distal triceps tendon rupture was classified by the Giannicola method, which is classified according to the depth and degree of the lesion based on MRI and surgical findings. Associated fractures and bone contusions on MRI were characterized. Ligament injuries on MRI was divided into partial and complete rupture. Agreement between the MRI and intraoperative findings for the presence of a traumatic distal triceps tendon rupture was perfect, and the Giannicola classification of traumatic distal triceps tendon rupture was good (kappa = 0.713). In the indirect injury group (fall on an outstretched hand), 15 of 15 patients had injuries that involved only the tendinous portion of the distal triceps, but these injuries were not full-thickness tears, whereas in the direct injury group, three of seven patients had a full-thickness rupture (odds ratio [OR] 1.75 [95% CI 0.92 to 3.32]; p = 0.02). The direct injury group had no associated ligamentous injuries while 14 of 15 patients with indirect injuries had ligamentous injuries (OR 0.13 [95% CI 0.02 to 0.78]; p < 0.001; associated injuries in the indirect group: anterior medial collateral ligament [14 of 15], posterior medial collateral ligament [7 of 15], and lateral collateral ligament complex [2 of 15]). Similarly, one of seven patients in