Association between intra-operative meatal mismatch and urethrocutaneous fistula development in hypospadias repair

The Glans-Meatus-Shaft (GMS) Score is a pre-operative phenotypic scoring system used to assess hypospadias severity and risk for post-operative complications. The ‘M’ component is based on pre-operative meatal location, but meatal location sometimes changes after penile degloving, resulting in ‘meat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pediatric urology 2021-04, Vol.17 (2), p.223.e1-223.e8
Hauptverfasser: D'Oro, Anthony, Chan, Yvonne Y., Rosoklija, Ilina, Meyer, Theresa, Shannon, Rachel, Johnson, Emilie K., Liu, Dennis B., Gong, Edward M., Maizels, Max, Matoka, Derek J., Yerkes, Elizabeth B., Lindgren, Bruce W., Cheng, Earl Y., Chu, David I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Glans-Meatus-Shaft (GMS) Score is a pre-operative phenotypic scoring system used to assess hypospadias severity and risk for post-operative complications. The ‘M’ component is based on pre-operative meatal location, but meatal location sometimes changes after penile degloving, resulting in ‘meatal mismatch.‘ To identify: 1) the incidence and clinical predictors of meatal mismatch, and 2) the association of meatal mismatch with post-operative urethrocutaneous fistula development. We performed a retrospective cohort study on patients who underwent primary hypospadias repair at a single center from 2011 to 2018. Meatal mismatch was defined as: upstaging (meatus moving more proximally after degloving), downstaging (moving more distally after degloving), or none. Covariates included: pre-degloving meatal location, chordee severity, penoscrotal anatomy, pre-operative testosterone, and number of stages for repair. To test the association between meatal mismatch and fistula development, we constructed two, nested, multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models with and without meatal mismatch and compared them with the likelihood ratio test. A sensitivity analysis excluded patients with
ISSN:1477-5131
1873-4898
DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.11.034