Effects of local laser treatment on vulvovaginal atrophy among women with breast cancer: a prospective study with long-term follow-up

Purpose Women with breast cancer (BC) often suffer from severe vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) which ultimately leads to poor sexual and urinary quality of life. We conducted a prospective study among women with BC and VVA, in order to evaluate the long-term effect of laser therapy on VVA. Methods Women...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Breast cancer research and treatment 2021-07, Vol.188 (2), p.501-509
Hauptverfasser: Veron, Lucie, Wehrer, Delphine, Annerose-Zéphir, Gisèle, Suciu, Voichita, Delaloge, Suzette, Pistilli, Barbara, Chaltiel, Dan, Pautier, Patricia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Women with breast cancer (BC) often suffer from severe vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) which ultimately leads to poor sexual and urinary quality of life. We conducted a prospective study among women with BC and VVA, in order to evaluate the long-term effect of laser therapy on VVA. Methods Women with BC and VVA were proposed to have fractional microablative CO 2 laser therapy (MonaLisaTouch®, DEKA) once per month for 3 months. Efficacy of laser therapy was assessed at baseline, 6 months and 18 months after treatment, using Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) score, Ditrovie score and vaginal pH. A pap smear was also performed and the epithelial maturation pattern was noted. Paired statistical tests were used to compare results between baseline, 6 months and 18 months. Results 46 women with BC (median age [interquartile range] 56.5 years [47.0 – 59.4]) were included between May and October 2018. PH level slightly decreased over time (mean Δ at 18 months −0.3, SD  = 0.7, p  = 0.02) whereas maturation pattern on pap smear did not change. Sexual quality of life was significantly improved at 6 months and 18 months (mean Δ at 6 months 8.3, SD  = 6.2 ( p  
ISSN:0167-6806
1573-7217
DOI:10.1007/s10549-021-06226-3