Gender representation in editorial boards of international general surgery journals
Abstract Background Despite women constituting over half of new doctors, gender disparity remains an issue. Surgery has shown particularly slow progress towards gender parity. This study aimed to quantify gender representation within editorial boards of the highest ranking international general surg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BJS open 2021-03, Vol.5 (2) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Background
Despite women constituting over half of new doctors, gender disparity remains an issue. Surgery has shown particularly slow progress towards gender parity. This study aimed to quantify gender representation within editorial boards of the highest ranking international general surgery journals.
Methods
Surgical journals were collated using two indices: SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) and Journal Impact Factor (JIF). Non-general surgery journals were excluded. Journals were contacted, requesting gender editorial team demographics. Editorial board data were collected via journal websites on 28 November 2019.
Results
The top 25 general surgery journals according to SJR and JIF ranking methods were determined, identifying 28 unique journals. Editorial board data were publicly available for 27 of these 28 surgical journals, and were examined. Women accounted for 20.2 per cent (568 of 2816) of total editorial board positions. Women constituted 11 per cent (4 of 36) of editor-in-chief positions, 32 per cent (29 of 92) of deputy editors, and 19.1 per cent (369 of 1935) of general editorial board positions.
Conclusion
The findings demonstrate gender disparity within editorial boards of the most prominent general surgery journals.
Gender disparity exists with the editorial boards of the most renowned general surgery journals. Women account for 20% of editorial board members and 11% of Editor in chief positions. The implications of such significant gender disparity are wide reaching.
Action needed to rectify disparity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2474-9842 2474-9842 |
DOI: | 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa064 |