Survival, local control, and health‐related quality of life in patients with oligometastatic and polymetastatic spinal tumors: A multicenter, international study

Background The treatment of oligometastatic (≤5 metastases) spinal disease has trended toward ablative therapies, yet to the authors’ knowledge little is known regarding the prognosis of patients presenting with oligometastatic spinal disease and the value of this approach. The objective of the curr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2019-03, Vol.125 (5), p.770-778
Hauptverfasser: Barzilai, Ori, Versteeg, Anne L., Sahgal, Arjun, Rhines, Laurence D., Bilsky, Mark H., Sciubba, Daniel M., Schuster, James M., Weber, Michael H., Pal Varga, Peter, Boriani, Stefano, Bettegowda, Chetan, Fehlings, Michael G., Yamada, Yoshiya, Clarke, Michelle J., Arnold, Paul M., Gokaslan, Ziya L., Fisher, Charles G., Laufer, Ilya, the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The treatment of oligometastatic (≤5 metastases) spinal disease has trended toward ablative therapies, yet to the authors’ knowledge little is known regarding the prognosis of patients presenting with oligometastatic spinal disease and the value of this approach. The objective of the current study was to compare the survival and clinical outcomes of patients with cancer with oligometastatic spinal disease with those of patients with polymetastatic (>5 metastases) disease. Methods The current study was an international, multicenter, prospective study. Patients who were admitted to a participating spine center with a diagnosis of spinal metastases and who underwent surgical intervention and/or radiotherapy between August 2013 and May 2017 were included. Data collected included demographics, overall survival, local control, and treatment information including surgical, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy details. Health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) measures included the EuroQOL 5 dimensions 3‐level questionnaire (EQ‐5D‐3L), the 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36v2), and the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ). Results Of the 393 patients included in the current study, 215 presented with oligometastatic disease and 178 presented with polymetastatic disease. A significant survival advantage of 90.1% versus 77.3% at 3 months and 77.0% versus 65.1% at 6 months from the time of treatment was found for patients presenting with oligometastatic disease compared with those with polymetastatic disease. It is important to note that both groups experienced significant improvements in multiple HRQOL measures at 6 months after treatment, with no differences in these outcome measures noted between the 2 groups. Conclusions The treatment of oligometastatic disease appears to offer a significant survival advantage compared with polymetastatic disease, regardless of treatment choice. HRQOL measures were found to improve in both groups, demonstrating a palliative benefit for all treated patients. There appears to be a significant survival advantage for patients presenting with oligometastatic disease compared with those with polymetastatic disease at the time of the initial treatment of spinal metastases regardless of the treatment method used. In the current study, both groups are reported to experience significant improvements in multiple measures of health‐related quality of life at 6 months.
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.31870