Conformational Differences Are Observed for the Active and Inactive Forms of Pinholin S21 Using DEER Spectroscopy
Bacteriophages have evolved with an efficient host cell lysis mechanism to terminate the infection cycle and release the new progeny virions at the optimum time, allowing adaptation with the changing host and environment. Among the lytic proteins, holin controls the first and rate-limiting step of h...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of physical chemistry. B 2020-12, Vol.124 (50), p.11396-11405 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Bacteriophages have evolved with an efficient host cell lysis mechanism to terminate the infection cycle and release the new progeny virions at the optimum time, allowing adaptation with the changing host and environment. Among the lytic proteins, holin controls the first and rate-limiting step of host cell lysis by permeabilizing the inner membrane at an allele-specific time known as “holin triggering”. Pinholin S21 is a prototype holin of phage Φ21 which makes many nanoscale holes and destroys the proton motive force, which in turn activates the signal anchor release (SAR) endolysin system to degrade the peptidoglycan layer of the host cell and destruction of the outer membrane by the spanin complex. Like many others, phage Φ21 has two holin proteins: active pinholin and antipinholin. The antipinholin form differs only by three extra amino acids at the N-terminus; however, it has a different structural topology and conformation with respect to the membrane. Predefined combinations of active pinholin and antipinholin fine-tune the lysis timing through structural dynamics and conformational changes. Previously, the dynamics and topology of active pinholin and antipinholin were investigated (Ahammad et al. JPCB 2019, 2020) using continuous wave electron paramagnetic resonance (CW-EPR) spectroscopy. However, detailed structural studies and direct comparison of these two forms of pinholin S21 are absent in the literature. In this study, the structural topology and conformations of active pinholin (S2168) and inactive antipinholin (S2168IRS) in DMPC (1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) proteoliposomes were investigated using the four-pulse double electron–electron resonance (DEER) EPR spectroscopic technique to measure distances between transmembrane domains 1 and 2 (TMD1 and TMD2). Five sets of interlabel distances were measured via DEER spectroscopy for both the active and inactive forms of pinholin S21. Structural models of the active pinholin and inactive antipinholin forms in DMPC proteoliposomes were obtained using the experimental DEER distances coupled with the simulated annealing software package Xplor-NIH. TMD2 of S2168 remains in the lipid bilayer, and TMD1 is partially externalized from the bilayer with some residues located on the surface. However, both TMDs remain incorporated in the lipid bilayer for the inactive S2168IRS form. This study demonstrates, for the first time, clear structural topology and conformational differences between |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1520-6106 1520-5207 |
DOI: | 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c09081 |