Clinical utility of circulating tumour cell-based monitoring of late-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: the randomised CirCe01 trial

Background CirCe01 trial aimed to assess the clinical utility of circulating tumour cell (CTC)-based monitoring in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients beyond the third line of chemotherapy (LC). Methods CirCe01 was a prospective, multicentre, randomised trial (NCT01349842) that included patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of cancer 2021-03, Vol.124 (7), p.1207-1213
Hauptverfasser: Cabel, Luc, Berger, Frédérique, Cottu, Paul, Loirat, Delphine, Rampanou, Aurore, Brain, Etienne, Cyrille, Stacy, Bourgeois, Hugues, Kiavue, Nicolas, Deluche, Elise, Ladoire, Sylvain, Campone, Mario, Pierga, Jean-Yves, Bidard, Francois-Clement
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background CirCe01 trial aimed to assess the clinical utility of circulating tumour cell (CTC)-based monitoring in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients beyond the third line of chemotherapy (LC). Methods CirCe01 was a prospective, multicentre, randomised trial (NCT01349842) that included patients with MBC after two systemic LC. Patients with ≥5 CTC/7.5 mL (CellSearch®) were randomised between the CTC-driven and the standard arm. In the CTC arm, changes in CTC count were assessed at the first cycle of each LC; patients in whom CTC levels predicted early tumour progression had to switch to a subsequent LC. Results Greater than or equal to 5 CTC/7.5 mL were observed in N  = 101/204 patients. In the CTC arm ( N  = 51), 43 (83%) and 18 (44%) patients completed CTC monitoring in the third and fourth lines, respectively, and 18 (42%) and 11 (61%) of these patients, respectively, had no CTC response. Thirteen (72%) and 5 (46%) of these patients underwent early switch to the next LC. Overall survival was not different between the two arms (hazard ratio = 0.95, 95% confidence interval = [0.6;1.4], p  = 0.8). In subgroup analyses, patients with no CTC response who switched chemotherapy experienced longer survival than patients who did not. Conclusions Due to the limited accrual and compliance, this trial failed to demonstrate the clinical utility of CTC monitoring. Clinical Trial Registration NCT, NCT01349842, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01349842 , registered 9 May 2011.
ISSN:0007-0920
1532-1827
DOI:10.1038/s41416-020-01227-3