The ocular surface bacterial contamination and its management in the prophylaxis of post cataract surgery endophthalmitis

To investigate the recent pieces of evidence regarding the bacterial ocular surface contamination and its treatment in the prophylaxis of post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis. We conducted a literature research on the topic of interest and selected the most relevant data. The studies reported a rel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Romanian journal of ophthalmology 2021-01, Vol.65 (1), p.2-9
Hauptverfasser: Simina, Daniela Soare, Larisa, Ilie, Otilia, Costeliu, Ana Cristina, Ghiță, Liliana, Mary Voinea, Aurelian, Mihai Ghiță
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To investigate the recent pieces of evidence regarding the bacterial ocular surface contamination and its treatment in the prophylaxis of post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis. We conducted a literature research on the topic of interest and selected the most relevant data. The studies reported a relatively high rate of positive conjunctival culture and the most frequently isolated organism was Coagulase negative Staphylococcus, which is also the most common etiological agent of the postoperative endophthalmitis. The bacterial ocular surface load is influenced by age, climate, associated diseases, topical and systemic medication. The use of povidone-iodine alone or in association with levofloxacin eyedrops as prophylactic method is effective in reducing the conjunctival bacterial contamination and consequently decreases the incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis. Based on the current pieces of evidence, adequate treatment of the bacterial ocular surface contamination prior to cataract surgery seems to be effective in preventing endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. EU = European Union, Spp. = Species, HIV = Human Immunodeficiency Virus.
ISSN:2457-4325
2501-2533
DOI:10.22336/rjo.2021.2