An online educational model in andrology for student training in the art of scientific writing in the COVID‐19 pandemic

In 2020, the COVID‐19 pandemic led to the suspension of the annual Summer Internship at the American Center for Reproductive Medicine (ACRM). To transit it into an online format, an inaugural 6‐week 2020 ACRM Online Mentorship Program was developed focusing on five core pillars of andrology research...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Andrologia 2021-04, Vol.53 (3), p.e13961-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Agarwal, Ashok, Leisegang, Kristian, Panner Selvam, Manesh Kumar, Durairajanayagam, Damayanthi, Barbarosie, Catalina, Finelli, Renata, Sengupta, Pallav, Dutta, Sulagna, Majzoub, Ahmad, Pushparaj, Peter Natesan, Elbardisi, Haitham, Sharma, Rakesh, Gupta, Sajal, Arafa, Mohamed, Roychoudhury, Shubhadeep, Alves, Marco G., Oliveira, Pedro Fontes, Henkel, Ralf
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In 2020, the COVID‐19 pandemic led to the suspension of the annual Summer Internship at the American Center for Reproductive Medicine (ACRM). To transit it into an online format, an inaugural 6‐week 2020 ACRM Online Mentorship Program was developed focusing on five core pillars of andrology research: scientific writing, scientific methodology, plagiarism understanding, soft skills development and mentee basic andrology knowledge. This study aims to determine mentee developmental outcomes based on student surveys and discuss these within the context of the relevant teaching and learning methodology. The mentorship was structured around scientific writing projects established by the team using a student‐centred approach, with one‐on‐one expert mentorship through weekly formative assessments. Furthermore, weekly online meetings were conducted, including expert lectures, formative assessments and social engagement. Data were collected through final assessments and mentee surveys on mentorship outcomes. Results show that mentees (n = 28) reported a significant (p 
ISSN:0303-4569
1439-0272
DOI:10.1111/and.13961