Difference in the efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implant before and after silicone oil removal: A case report

An intravitreal dexamethasone (IV-DEX) implant is safe and effective for the treatment of macular edemas; however, the efficacy of IV-DEX implants in silicone oil (SO)-filled eyes remains controversial. There is no previous study comparing an IV-DEX implant in the same eye with and without intravitr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2021-03, Vol.100 (11), p.e25161-e25161
Hauptverfasser: An, Jae Hong, Kim, Yu Cheol
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:An intravitreal dexamethasone (IV-DEX) implant is safe and effective for the treatment of macular edemas; however, the efficacy of IV-DEX implants in silicone oil (SO)-filled eyes remains controversial. There is no previous study comparing an IV-DEX implant in the same eye with and without intravitreal SO. A 72-year-old man with proliferative diabetic retinopathy, macular edema, and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, treated with pars plana vitrectomy with SO tamponade had refractory macular edema. Refractory macular edema. Subtenon triamcinolone injection, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection, and IV-DEX implantation were performed; this was followed by intravitreal SO removal combined with IV-DEX implantation. The macular edema did not decrease significantly with posterior subtenon triamcinolone injection, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection, and IV-DEX implantation; however, the edema was relieved after SO removal and a new IV-DEX implantation. IV-DEX implant may be less efficacious in the treatment of macular edema in an SO-filled eye than that in a normal vitreous cavity.
ISSN:0025-7974
1536-5964
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000025161