Influence of BRAF and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab or cetuximab as first-line therapy in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal carcinoma and <3 baseline circulating tumour cells: the randomised phase II VISNÚ-2 study

We explored the influence of BRAF and PIK3CA mutational status on the efficacy of bevacizumab or cetuximab plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line therapy in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). VISNÚ-2 was a multicentre, randomised, phase II...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ESMO open 2021-04, Vol.6 (2), p.100062-100062, Article 100062
Hauptverfasser: Sastre, J., García-Alfonso, P., Viéitez, J.M., Cano, M.T., Rivera, F., Reina-Zoilo, J.J., Salud-Salvia, A., Quintero, G., Robles-Díaz, L., Safont, M.J., La Casta, A., Gil, S., Polo, E., Asensio-Martínez, E., García-Paredes, B., López, R.L., Guillot, M., Valladares-Ayerbes, M., Aranda, E., Díaz-Rubio, E., Jiménez, P., Aguilar, E. Aranda, Gómez, A., Gil Calle, S., Salud, A., Valladares, M., Graña, B., Reina, J.J., González Flores, E., Salgado, M., Grande, E., Guillén, C., Garcia Carbonero, R., Flor, M.J., Arévalo, S., López López, R., Manzano, H., Hernández Yagüe, X., Arrivi, A., Falcó, E., Gallego, J., Escudero, P., Cabezas, I., Juárez, A., Gálvez, E., Grávalos, C., Robles, L., Dueñas, R., Campos, J.M., Albert, A., Salinas, P., Montagut, C., Provencio, M., Ruiz Casado, A., Muñoz, J., Gil Raga, M., Chilet, M.R., González González, F.J., Massutí, B., López, A., Aparicio, J., Marín, M., Alfaro, J., Zanui, M., Gutiérrez Abad, D., García Tapiador, A.M., García-Girón, C., Molina Saera, J., Torres Sánchez, E., López, I., Bosch, C., Valero, J., Martínez de Prado, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We explored the influence of BRAF and PIK3CA mutational status on the efficacy of bevacizumab or cetuximab plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line therapy in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). VISNÚ-2 was a multicentre, randomised, phase II study. Patients with RAS wild-type mCRC and 1), and allocated to bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) or cetuximab (400 mg/m2 then 250 mg/m2 weekly) plus FOLFIRI [irinotecan 180 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 (bolus) then 2400 mg/m2 (46-h continuous infusion) every 2 weeks]. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). All analyses were exploratory. Two hundred and forty patients with BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type (n = 196) or BRAF- and/or PIK3CA-mutated tumours (n = 44) were enrolled. Median PFS was 12.7 and 8.8 months in patients with BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type and BRAF/PIK3CA-mutated tumours, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-1.85; P = 0.3602]. In the BRAF- and/or PIK3CA-mutated cohort, median PFS was 2.8, 8.8 and 15.0 months in patients with BRAF/PI3KCA-mutated (n = 8), BRAF-mutated/PI3KCA wild-type (n = 16) and BRAF wild-type/PI3KCA-mutated (n = 20) tumours, respectively (P = 0.0002). PFS was similar with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI versus cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type (HR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.67-1.45; P = 0.9486) and BRAF/PIK3CA-mutated tumours (HR = 1.11; 95% CI 0.53-2.35; P = 0.7820). The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia, diarrhoea and asthenia in both treatment groups. BRAF/PIK3CA status influences outcomes in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC but does not appear to assist with the selection of first-line targeted therapy. •This study examined if BRAF/PIK3CA mutational status can guide therapy in RAS wild-type mCRC.•BRAF mutations were associated with poorer survival outcomes, and were potentiated by PI3KCA mutations.•Bevacizumab-FOLFIRI versus cetuximab-FOLFIRI had similar outcomes in BRAF /PIK3CA wild-type and BRAF /PIK3CA-mutated tumours.•BRAF and PI3KCA mutations have a role as prognostic but not predictive factors.
ISSN:2059-7029
2059-7029
DOI:10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100062