Recent Administration of Iodinated Contrast Renders Core Infarct Estimation Inaccurate Using RAPID Software

Automated CTP software is increasingly used for extended window emergent large-vessel occlusion to quantify core infarct. We aimed to assess whether RAPID software underestimates core infarct in patients with an extended window recently receiving IV iodinated contrast. We reviewed a prospective, sin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR 2020-12, Vol.41 (12), p.2235-2242
Hauptverfasser: Copelan, A Z, Smith, E R, Drocton, G T, Narsinh, K H, Murph, D, Khangura, R S, Hartley, Z J, Abla, A A, Dillon, W P, Dowd, C F, Higashida, R T, Halbach, V V, Hetts, S W, Cooke, D L, Keenan, K, Nelson, J, Mccoy, D, Ciano, M, Amans, M R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Automated CTP software is increasingly used for extended window emergent large-vessel occlusion to quantify core infarct. We aimed to assess whether RAPID software underestimates core infarct in patients with an extended window recently receiving IV iodinated contrast. We reviewed a prospective, single-center data base of 271 consecutive patients who underwent CTA ± CTP for acute ischemic stroke from May 2018 through January 2019. Patients with emergent large-vessel occlusion confirmed by CTA in the extended window (>6 hours since last known well) and CTP with RAPID postprocessing were included. Two blinded raters independently assessed CT ASPECTS on NCCT performed at the time of CTP. RAPID software used relative cerebral blood flow of
ISSN:0195-6108
1936-959X
DOI:10.3174/ajnr.A6908