A novel preoperative risk score to optimize patient selection for performing concomitant liver resection with cytoreductive surgery/HIPEC

Background While parenchymal hepatic metastases were previously considered a contraindication to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), liver resection (LR) is increasingly performed with CRS/HIPEC. Methods Patients from the US HIPEC Collaborative (2000–2017) wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of surgical oncology 2021-01, Vol.123 (1), p.187-195
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Rachel M., Gamboa, Adriana C., Turgeon, Michael K., Zaidi, Mohammad Y., Kimbrough, Charles, Leiting, Jennifer, Grotz, Travis, Lee, Andrew J., Fournier, Keith, Powers, Benjamin, Dineen, Sean, Baumgartner, Joel M., Veerapong, Jula, Mogal, Harveshp, Clarke, Callisia, Wilson, Gregory, Patel, Sameer, Hendrix, Ryan, Lambert, Laura, Pokrzywa, Courtney, Abbott, Daniel E., LaRocca, Christopher J., Raoof, Mustafa, Greer, Jonathan, Johnston, Fabian M., Staley, Charles A., Cloyd, Jordan M., Maithel, Shishir K., Russell, Maria C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background While parenchymal hepatic metastases were previously considered a contraindication to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), liver resection (LR) is increasingly performed with CRS/HIPEC. Methods Patients from the US HIPEC Collaborative (2000–2017) with invasive appendiceal or colorectal adenocarcinoma undergoing primary, curative intent CRS/HIPEC with CC0‐1 resection were included. LR was defined as a formal parenchymal resection. Primary endpoints were postoperative complications and overall survival (OS). Results A total of 658 patients were included. About 83 (15%) underwent LR of colorectal (58%) or invasive appendiceal (42%) metastases. LR patients had more complications (81% vs. 60%; p = .001), greater number of complications (2.3 vs. 1.5; p 
ISSN:0022-4790
1096-9098
DOI:10.1002/jso.26239