Refining Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation Definition by Echocardiography with a New Outcomes-Based “Massive” Grade

Current echocardiographic guidelines recommend that tricuspid regurgitation (TR) severity be graded in three categories, following assessment of specific parameters. Findings from recent trials have shown that the severity of TR frequently far exceeds the current definition of severe. We postulated...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2020-09, Vol.33 (9), p.1087-1094
Hauptverfasser: Kebed, Kalie Y., Addetia, Karima, Henry, Michael, Yamat, Megan, Weinert, Lynn, Besser, Stephanie A., Mor-Avi, Victor, Lang, Roberto M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Current echocardiographic guidelines recommend that tricuspid regurgitation (TR) severity be graded in three categories, following assessment of specific parameters. Findings from recent trials have shown that the severity of TR frequently far exceeds the current definition of severe. We postulated that a grading approach that emphasizes outcomes could be useful to identify patients with severe TR at increased risk of mortality. We identified 284 patients with echocardiograms demonstrating severe functional TR, defined as vena contracta (VC) ≥ 0.7 cm. Demographics and mortality data were obtained from the medical records. Patients were divided into study (n = 122 patients with three-dimensional images) and validation (n = 162) cohorts. The VC was measured in both the right ventricular (RV) inflow and apical four-chamber views and averaged. For the study cohort, tricuspid annular, RV end-diastolic (basal, mid, long axis) dimensions, tricuspid leaflet tenting height and area, RV free-wall longitudinal strain, and RV volumes were measured from two- and three-dimensional data sets. A K-partition algorithm was used in the study cohort to derive a mortality-related cutoff VC value, above which TR was termed “massive.” The ability of this VC cutoff to identify patients at greater mortality risk was then tested in the validation cohort using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. In the study cohort, VC > 0.92 cm (massive TR) was optimally associated with worse survival. Tricuspid annular and RV size were larger in the massive group (P 
ISSN:0894-7317
1097-6795
DOI:10.1016/j.echo.2020.05.007