Survival benefit of perioperative chemotherapy for T1-3N0M0 stage esophageal cancer: a SEER database analysis

The effect of perioperative chemotherapy on patients with lymph node-negative esophageal cancer (EC) is controversial. This study explored which EC patients, staged under the T1-3N0M0, would benefit from perioperative chemotherapy. Data on patients with diagnosed primary EC were retrieved from Surve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of thoracic disease 2021-02, Vol.13 (2), p.995-1004
Hauptverfasser: Shao, Yue, Chen, Dan, Ye, Liu, Wang, Xin-Mei, Wu, Qing-Chen, Zhang, Cheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The effect of perioperative chemotherapy on patients with lymph node-negative esophageal cancer (EC) is controversial. This study explored which EC patients, staged under the T1-3N0M0, would benefit from perioperative chemotherapy. Data on patients with diagnosed primary EC were retrieved from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score-matched (PSM) method was performed to balance baseline covariates. Multivariate Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curve were used to assess potential survival difference between patients undergoing surgery plus perioperative chemotherapy (SA + CT) and those undergoing surgery alone (SA). In a total of 2,711 EC patients (T1-3N0M0), 166 patients underwent SA + CT and 2,545 patients received SA. In the multivariable analysis, T stage was significantly related to prognosis of EC patients before and after matching. Subgroup analysis showed that perioperative chemotherapy was associated with poor cancer-specific survival (CSS) for stage T1 patients. There was no effect of perioperative chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) or CSS for T2 patients, whereas a remarkable improvement in OS and CSS was observed for T3 patients. Survival analysis showed that T3 stage EC patients obtained survival benefit from SA + CT. Prognosis in the SA group was significantly better than in the SA + CT group for T1 patients. However, T2 patients showed no significant increase in survival after undergoing SA + CT compared with SA. T3 patients benefit more from SA + CT. However, perioperative chemotherapy does not present survival benefit to T1-2 patients, and it is an adverse prognostic factor for T1 patients.
ISSN:2072-1439
2077-6624
DOI:10.21037/jtd-20-2877