Regioisomerization of Antimalarial Drug WR99210 Explains the Inactivity of a Commercial Stock

WR99210, a former antimalarial drug candidate now widely used for the selection of transfectants, selectively targets the parasite's dihydrofolate reductase thymidine synthase bifunctional enzyme (DHFR-TS) but not human DHFR, which is not fused with TS. Accordingly, WR99210 and plasmids express...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 2020-12, Vol.65 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Remcho, T Parks, Guggilapu, Sravanthi D, Cruz, Phillip, Nardone, Glenn A, Heffernan, Gavin, O'Connor, Robert D, Bewley, Carole A, Wellems, Thomas E, Lane, Kristin D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:WR99210, a former antimalarial drug candidate now widely used for the selection of transfectants, selectively targets the parasite's dihydrofolate reductase thymidine synthase bifunctional enzyme (DHFR-TS) but not human DHFR, which is not fused with TS. Accordingly, WR99210 and plasmids expressing the human gene have become valued tools for the genetic modification of parasites in the laboratory. Concerns over the ineffectiveness of WR99210 from some sources encouraged us to investigate the biological and chemical differences of supplies from two different companies (compounds 1 and 2). Compound 1 proved effective at low nanomolar concentrations against parasites, whereas compound 2 was ineffective, even at micromolar concentrations. Intact and fragmented mass spectra indicated identical molecular formulae of the unprotonated (free base) structures of compounds 1 and 2; however, the compounds displayed differences by thin-layer chromatography, reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, and UV-visible spectroscopy, indicating important isomeric differences. Structural evaluations by H, C, and N nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy confirmed compound 1 as WR99210 and compound 2 as a dihydrotriazine regioisomer. Induced fit computational docking models showed that compound 1 binds tightly and specifically in the DHFR active site, whereas compound 2 fits poorly to the active site in loose and varied orientations. Stocks and concentrates of WR99210 should be monitored for the presence of regioisomer 2, particularly when they are not supplied as the hydrochloride salt or are exposed to basic conditions that may promote rearrangement. Absorption spectroscopy can serve for assays of the unrearranged and rearranged triazines.
ISSN:0066-4804
1098-6596
DOI:10.1128/AAC.01385-20