Using a self-rehabilitation application alone can effectively combat post-ACL ligament reconstruction flexion contracture during the COVID-19 lockdown
Objectives: The lockdown during the COVID-19 crisis deprived the majority of patients who had undergone ACL surgery of access to their physical therapist. The objective of the study was to analyze the benefit of using a self-rehabilitation application to combat post-ligament reconstruction flexion c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine 2021-02, Vol.9 (2_suppl) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives:
The lockdown during the COVID-19 crisis deprived the majority of patients who had undergone ACL surgery of access to their physical therapist. The objective of the study was to analyze the benefit of using a self-rehabilitation application to combat post-ligament reconstruction flexion contracture in the absence of rehabilitation during the lockdown.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective study that compared 2 groups of patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction: the "App" group that underwent surgery between 10 February and 15 March 2020 were partially or totally deprived of access to a physiotherapist due to the COVID-19 lockdown and had completed rehabilitation using a self-rehabilitation application, and the "Physio" group that underwent surgery between 16 May and 23 December 2019 and had completed rehabilitation with a physiotherapist.
Results:
148 patients were included in the study: 47 in the "App" group and 101 in the "Physio" group. Mean flexion contracture 3 weeks postoperatively was 1.3° +/- 3.8 in the "App" group versus 3.3° +/- 4 in the "Physio" group (p=0.002). The rate of flexion contractures was 45% in the “App” group and 65% in the “Physio” group (p=0.025). 71.4% of the patients acquired knee locking on weight-bearing with crutches in the "App" group, compared to 40.6% in the "Physio" group (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2325-9671 2325-9671 |
DOI: | 10.1177/2325967121S00018 |