Seizures associated with antibodies against cell surface antigens are acute symptomatic and not indicative of epilepsy: insights from long-term data
Background Clinicians have questioned whether any disorder involving seizures and neural antibodies should be called “(auto)immune epilepsy.” The concept of “acute symptomatic seizures” may be more applicable in cases with antibodies against neural cell surface antigens. We aimed at determining the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurology 2021-03, Vol.268 (3), p.1059-1069 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Clinicians have questioned whether any disorder involving seizures and neural antibodies should be called “(auto)immune epilepsy.” The concept of “acute symptomatic seizures” may be more applicable in cases with antibodies against neural cell surface antigens. We aimed at determining the probability of achieving seizure-freedom, the use of anti-seizure medication (ASM), and immunotherapy in patients with either constellation. As a potential pathophysiological correlate, we analyzed antibody titer courses.
Methods
Retrospective cohort study of 39 patients with seizures and neural antibodies, follow-up ≥ 3 years.
Results
Patients had surface antibodies against the
N
-methyl-
d
-aspartate receptor (NMDAR,
n
= 6), leucine-rich glioma inactivated protein 1 (LGI1,
n
= 11), contactin-associated protein-2 (CASPR2,
n
= 8), or antibodies against the intracellular antigens glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 kDa (GAD65,
n
= 13) or Ma2 (
n
= 1). Patients with surface antibodies reached first seizure-freedom (88% vs. 7%,
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0340-5354 1432-1459 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00415-020-10250-6 |