Genomic Characterization of de novo Metastatic Breast Cancer

In contrast to recurrence after initial diagnosis of stage I-III breast cancer [recurrent metastatic breast cancer (rMBC)], metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) represents a unique setting to elucidate metastatic drivers in the absence of treatment selection. We present the genomic landscape of dnMBC an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical cancer research 2021-02, Vol.27 (4), p.1105-1118
Hauptverfasser: Garrido-Castro, Ana C, Spurr, Liam F, Hughes, Melissa E, Li, Yvonne Y, Cherniack, Andrew D, Kumari, Priti, Lloyd, Maxwell R, Bychkovsky, Brittany, Barroso-Sousa, Romualdo, Di Lascio, Simona, Jain, Esha, Files, Janet, Mohammed-Abreu, Ayesha, Krevalin, Max, MacKichan, Colin, Barry, William T, Guo, Hao, Xia, Daniel, Cerami, Ethan, Rollins, Barrett J, MacConaill, Laura E, Lindeman, Neal I, Krop, Ian E, Johnson, Bruce E, Wagle, Nikhil, Winer, Eric P, Dillon, Deborah A, Lin, Nancy U
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In contrast to recurrence after initial diagnosis of stage I-III breast cancer [recurrent metastatic breast cancer (rMBC)], metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) represents a unique setting to elucidate metastatic drivers in the absence of treatment selection. We present the genomic landscape of dnMBC and association with overall survival (OS). Targeted DNA sequencing (OncoPanel) was prospectively performed on either primary or metastatic tumors from 926 patients (212 dnMBC and 714 rMBC). Single-nucleotide variants, copy-number variations, and tumor mutational burden (TMB) in treatment-naïve dnMBC primary tumors were compared with primary tumors in patients who ultimately developed rMBC, and correlated with OS across all dnMBC. When comparing primary tumors by subtype, amplification was enriched in triple-negative dnMBC versus rMBC (21.1% vs. 0%, = 0.0005, = 0.111). Mutations in , and were more prevalent, and and less prevalent, in primary HR /HER2 tumors of dnMBC versus rMBC, though not significant after multiple comparison adjustment. Alterations associated with shorter OS in dnMBC included TP53 (wild-type: 79.7 months; altered: 44.2 months; = 0.008, = 0.107), MYC (79.7 vs. 23.3 months; = 0.0003, = 0.011), and cell-cycle (122.7 vs. 54.9 months; = 0.034, = 0.245) pathway genes. High TMB correlated with better OS in triple-negative dnMBC ( = 0.041). Genomic differences between treatment-naïve dnMBC and primary tumors of patients who developed rMBC may provide insight into mechanisms underlying metastatic potential and differential therapeutic sensitivity in dnMBC. Alterations associated with poor OS in dnMBC highlight the need for novel approaches to overcome potential intrinsic resistance to current treatments.
ISSN:1078-0432
1557-3265
DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-1720