Rates of substance use disorder treatment seeking visits after emergency department-initiated buprenorphine

Emergency department-initiated buprenorphine (EDIB) programs have been shown to improve treatment outcomes for patients with opioid use disorders (OUD); however, little is known about how EDIB implementation impacts the patient census at participating hospitals. To determine if implementation of an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of emergency medicine 2020-05, Vol.38 (5), p.975-978
Hauptverfasser: Jennings, Lindsey K., Bogan, Carolyn, McCauley, Jenna J., Moreland, Angela, Lane, Suzanne, Ward, Ralph, Hartwell, Karen J., Haynes, Louise, Brady, Kathleen T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Emergency department-initiated buprenorphine (EDIB) programs have been shown to improve treatment outcomes for patients with opioid use disorders (OUD); however, little is known about how EDIB implementation impacts the patient census at participating hospitals. To determine if implementation of an EDIB program was associated with changes in the number of patients presenting to the ED seeking treatment for substance use disorder (SUD). We conducted a retrospective evaluation at a single academic ED that began offering EDIB in December 2017. Data span the period of December 2016 to April 2019, All ED visits with a chief complaint of addiction problem, detoxification, drug/alcohol assessment, drug problem, or withdrawal charted by nursing at the time of triage were eligible for inclusion. Charts were reviewed to determine: (1) treatment status and (2) substance(s) for which the patient was seeking treatment. An interrupted time series analysis was used to compare the pre- and post-EDIB rates for all-substance, as well as opioid-specific, treatment-seeking visits. For all-substance visits, the predicted level change in the treatment-seeking rate after EDIB was implemented was positive but not significant (0.000497, p = 0.53); the trend change after EDIB was also not significant (−0.00004, p = 0.73). For visits involving opioids, the predicted level change was (0.000638, p = 0.21); and the trend change was (0.000047, p = 0.49). Implementation of an EDIB program was not associated with increased rates of presentation by patients requesting treatment for a substance use disorder in the participating ED setting.
ISSN:0735-6757
1532-8171
DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2020.02.011