Field Test Results of Sex- and Gender-Specific Health Multimedia Case-Based Learning Modules

The sex- and gender-specific health (SGSH) multimedia case-based learning modules (MCBLMs) were developed to address the absence of validated or peer-reviewed material that incorporates topics of sex and gender differences into medical curricula. This article provides the methodology for development...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of women's health (Larchmont, N.Y. 2002) N.Y. 2002), 2019-12, Vol.28 (12), p.1755-1761
Hauptverfasser: Casanova, Robert, Miller, Virginia, Cheon, Jongpil, Gilmore, Linda, Barron, Rebecca, Cannaday, Rania, Case, Gretchen, Digre, Kathleen, Jensen, Jani, McGregor, Alyson J, Pippitt, Karly, Davidge-Pitts, Caroline, Pomeroy, Brian, Webster, Dan, Jenkins, Marjorie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The sex- and gender-specific health (SGSH) multimedia case-based learning modules (MCBLMs) were developed to address the absence of validated or peer-reviewed material that incorporates topics of sex and gender differences into medical curricula. This article provides the methodology for development of the modules and reports the results of a field test of the modules in different medical educational settings. MCBLMs were created by a multidisciplinary committee of scientists, health profession educators, and students. Two modules, osteoporosis and diabetes, were tested in various settings based on the curricular needs at each of the five accredited institutions. Each module consisted of a pretest and three interactive, multimedia stand-alone sections with post-tests. Scores on the tests were compared using a paired-samples -test. A postmodule survey was used to evaluate the format. Four hundred eighteen students participated in the field testing. For the 194 who completed the osteoporosis module, the post-test scores (M = 13.71, standard deviation [SD] = 2.09) were significantly higher than the pretest scores (M = 10.54, SD = 2.41),  
ISSN:1540-9996
1931-843X
DOI:10.1089/jwh.2018.7504