Long-term course of contrast sensitivity in eyes after laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis for myopia
Purpose: To evaluate the long-term contrast sensitivity (CS) after laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia. Methods: This retrospective, single-center, cohort study involved 190 eyes of 95 patients who underwent bilateral LASIK between January 2001 and October 2007. This study includes patie...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Indian journal of ophthalmology 2020-12, Vol.68 (12), p.2981-2984 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose: To evaluate the long-term contrast sensitivity (CS) after laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia. Methods: This retrospective, single-center, cohort study involved 190 eyes of 95 patients who underwent bilateral LASIK between January 2001 and October 2007. This study includes patients who underwent CS and higher-order aberration (HOA) measurements in a five-year postoperative period. For all enrolled patients, visual acuity, refractive error (RE) in diopters (D), CS at 3-, 6-, 12-, and 18-cycles per degree (cpd), and HOA in a 4 mm area of the dilated pupil were measured before surgery and 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years after it. Results: The mean RE measured before the surgery and after 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years after was -6.08 ± 2.50D, −0.26 ± 0.65D, −0.28 ± 0.65D, and −0.48 ± 0.80D, respectively. There were no clinically significant changes between preoperative results and the measures taken 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years after surgery. The slight increase in HOA had little effect on CS over the mid to long-term postoperative period. Conclusion: Our findings show that CS does not clinically change post LASIK. Although we were unable to identify the specific mechanism, we theorize that after LASIK there is a possibility for the compensation of HOA. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0301-4738 1998-3689 |
DOI: | 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1916_19 |