Defining the dose‐volume criteria for laryngeal sparing in locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer utilizing split‐field IMRT, whole‐field IMRT and VMAT
Purpose To determine the optimal dose‐volume constraint for laryngeal sparing using three commonly employed intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) approaches in patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated to the bilateral neck. Materials and methods Thirty patients with stage II‐IVA oropharynx...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2021-01, Vol.22 (1), p.37-44 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
To determine the optimal dose‐volume constraint for laryngeal sparing using three commonly employed intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) approaches in patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated to the bilateral neck.
Materials and methods
Thirty patients with stage II‐IVA oropharynx cancers received definitive radiotherapy with split‐field IMRT (SF‐IMRT) to the bilateral neck between 2008 and 2013. Each case was re‐planned using whole‐field IMRT (WF‐IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and plan quality metrics and dose to laryngeal structures was evaluated. Two larynx volumes were defined and compared on the current study: the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) larynx as defined per the RTOG 1016 protocol and the MDACC larynx defined as the components of the larynx bounded by the superior and inferior extent of the thyroid cartilage.
Results
Target coverage, conformity, and heterogeneity indices were similar in all techniques. The RTOG larynx mean dose was lower with WF‐IMRT than SF‐IMRT (22.1 vs 25.8 Gy; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1526-9914 1526-9914 |
DOI: | 10.1002/acm2.13009 |