Long‐Term Influence of Electrode Array Length on Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users

Objectives/Hypothesis Results from a prospective trial demonstrated better speech recognition for cochlear implant (CI) recipients implanted with a long lateral wall electrode array compared to subjects with a short array after 1 year of listening experience. As short array recipients may require an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Laryngoscope 2021-04, Vol.131 (4), p.892-897
Hauptverfasser: Canfarotta, Michael W., Dillon, Margaret T., Buchman, Craig A., Buss, Emily, O'Connell, Brendan P., Rooth, Meredith A., King, English R., Pillsbury, Harold C., Adunka, Oliver F., Brown, Kevin D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives/Hypothesis Results from a prospective trial demonstrated better speech recognition for cochlear implant (CI) recipients implanted with a long lateral wall electrode array compared to subjects with a short array after 1 year of listening experience. As short array recipients may require an extended adaptation period, this study investigated whether differences in speech recognition continued through 4 years of CI use. Study Design Long‐term follow‐up of a prospective randomized trial. Methods Subjects were randomized to receive a MED‐EL medium (24 mm) or standard (31.5 mm) array. Linear mixed models compared speech recognition between cohorts with word recognition in quiet and sentence recognition in noise at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 months postactivation. Postoperative imaging and electric frequency filters were reviewed to assess the influence of frequency‐to‐place mismatch and angular separation between neighboring contacts, a metric associated with peripheral spectral selectivity. Results Long (31.5 mm) array recipients demonstrated superior speech recognition out to 4 years postactivation. There was a significant effect of angular separation between contacts, with more closely spaced contacts associated with poorer speech recognition. There was no significant effect of mismatch, yet this may have been obscured by changes in frequency filters over time. Conclusions Conventional MED‐EL CI recipients implanted with 31.5‐mm arrays experience better speech recognition than 24‐mm array recipients, initially and with long‐term listening experience. The benefit conferred by longer arrays in the present cohort can be partially attributed to more widely spaced electrode contacts, presumably a result of reduced channel interaction. Level of Evidence 2 Laryngoscope, 131:892–897, 2021
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
DOI:10.1002/lary.28949