Intention matters more than attention: Item-method directed forgetting of items at attended and unattended locations
This study embedded attentional cues in the study phase of an item-method directed forgetting task. We used an unpredictive onset cue (Experiment 1 ), a predictive onset cue (Experiment 2 ), or a predictive central cue (Experiments 3 – 6 ) to direct attention to the left or right. In Experiments 1 –...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Attention, perception & psychophysics perception & psychophysics, 2021-05, Vol.83 (4), p.1629-1651 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This study embedded attentional cues in the study phase of an item-method directed forgetting task. We used an unpredictive onset cue (Experiment
1
), a predictive onset cue (Experiment
2
), or a predictive central cue (Experiments
3
–
6
) to direct attention to the left or right. In Experiments
1
–
5
, this was followed by a pink or blue study word that required a speeded colour discrimination; in Experiment
6
, it was followed by a pink or blue word or nonword that required a lexical decision. Each study word was followed by an instruction to Remember or Forget. A yes–no recognition test confirmed better recognition of to-be-remembered words than to-be-forgotten words; a cueing effect confirmed the effectiveness of predictive cues in allocating attentional resources. There was, however, no evidence that the directed forgetting effect differed for attended and unattended words: Encoding depends more on the memory intention formed after a study word has disappeared than on the availability of processing resources when that word first appears. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1943-3921 1943-393X 1943-393X |
DOI: | 10.3758/s13414-020-02220-x |