Improving tobacco dependence treatment outcomes for smokers of lower socioeconomic status: A randomized clinical trial

•Treatments for tobacco dependence are less effective for lower socioeconomic groups.•Adapted treatment eliminates the socioeconomic gradient in outcomes.•Adapted treatment improves short-term outcomes for lower socioeconomic groups.•No long-term outcome differences are found between adapted and sta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Drug and alcohol dependence 2017-12, Vol.181, p.177-185
Hauptverfasser: Sheffer, Christine E., Bickel, Warren K., Franck, Christopher T., Panissidi, Luana, Pittman, Jami C., Stayna, Helen, Evans, Shenell
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Treatments for tobacco dependence are less effective for lower socioeconomic groups.•Adapted treatment eliminates the socioeconomic gradient in outcomes.•Adapted treatment improves short-term outcomes for lower socioeconomic groups.•No long-term outcome differences are found between adapted and standard treatment.•Extended support might help sustain short-term outcomes. Evidence-based treatments for tobacco dependence are significantly less effective for smokers of lower socioeconomic status which contributes to socioeconomic disparities in smoking prevalence rates and health. We aimed to reduce the socioeconomic gradient in treatment outcomes by systematically adapting evidence-based, cognitive-behavioral treatment for tobacco dependence for diverse lower socioeconomic smokers. Participants were randomized to adapted or standard treatment, received six 1-h group treatment sessions, and were followed for six months. We examined the effectiveness of the adapted treatment to improve treatment outcomes for lower socioeconomic groups. Participants (n=227) were ethnically, racially, and socioeconomically diverse. The adapted treatment significantly reduced the days to relapse for the two lowest socioeconomic groups: SES1: M=76.6 (SD 72.9) vs. 38.3 (SD 60.1) days to relapse (RR=0.63 95% CI, 0.45, 0.88, p=0.0013); SES2: M=88.2 (SD 67.3) vs. 40.1 (SD 62.6 days to relapse (RR=0.57 95% CI, 0.18, 0.70, p=0.0024). Interactions between socioeconomic status and condition were significant for initial abstinence (OR=1.26, 95% CI 1.09, 1.46, p=0.002), approached significance for 3-month abstinence (OR=0.90, 95% CI 0.80, 1.01, p
ISSN:0376-8716
1879-0046
DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.09.015