Assessment of hospital‐level adjusted breast cancer sentinel lymph node positivity rates

Background/Objectives Proficiency of performing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for breast cancer varies among hospitals and may be reflected in the hospital's SLNB positivity rate. Our objectives were to examine whether hospital characteristics are associated with variation in SLNB positivit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of surgical oncology 2019-01, Vol.119 (1), p.101-108
Hauptverfasser: Berger, Elizabeth R., Bilimoria, Karl Y., Kinnier, Christine V., Minami, Christina A., Bethke, Kevin P., Hansen, Nora M., Merkow, Ryan P., Winchester, David P., Yang, Anthony D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background/Objectives Proficiency of performing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for breast cancer varies among hospitals and may be reflected in the hospital's SLNB positivity rate. Our objectives were to examine whether hospital characteristics are associated with variation in SLNB positivity rates and whether hospitals with lower‐than‐expected SLNB positivity rates have worse patient survival. Methods Using the National Cancer Data Base, stage I to III breast cancer patients were identified (2004‐2012). Hospital‐level SLNB positivity rates were adjusted for tumor and patient factors. Hospitals were divided into terciles of SLNB positivity rates (lower‐, higher‐, as‐expected). Hospital characteristics and survival were examined across terciles. Results Of 438 610 SLNB patients (from 1357 hospitals), 78 104 had one or more positive SLN (21.3%). Hospitals in the low and high terciles were more likely to be low volume (low: RRR, 4.40; 95% CI, 2.89‐6.57; P 
ISSN:0022-4790
1096-9098
DOI:10.1002/jso.25294