Reducing infant catheterization in the emergency department through clean‐catch urine collection
Objective Our emergency department (ED) traditionally relied on urethral catheterization to obtain urine cultures when evaluating infants for urinary tract infections (UTIs). Catheterization is associated with adverse effects, and recent studies have demonstrated clean‐catch urine methods can be suc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open 2020-12, Vol.1 (6), p.1533-1541 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
Our emergency department (ED) traditionally relied on urethral catheterization to obtain urine cultures when evaluating infants for urinary tract infections (UTIs). Catheterization is associated with adverse effects, and recent studies have demonstrated clean‐catch urine methods can be successfully used to obtain urine cultures. We pursued a quality improvement (QI) initiative aimed at decreasing the frequency of urethral catheterizations in our ED by using an established clean‐catch technique to obtain infant urine cultures.
Methods
We implemented a clean‐catch urine collection method, which we entitled “Bladder Massage,” for infants 0–6 months of age needing a urine culture in our ED. Exclusions included critical illness, known urologic abnormality, or prior UTI diagnosis. Our primary interventions were educational initiatives. We retrospectively collected data regarding the use of bladder massage. Our balancing measure was the contamination rate of urine cultures obtained via bladder massage technique compared to catheterization.
Results
In our first‐year post‐implementation, we identified 334 eligible patients. Bladder massage was attempted on 136/334 (40.7%) eligible infants, with 87/136 (64%) successful attempts, thus avoiding catheterization in 26.1% of patients. Our baseline contamination rate from catheterization was 8/488 (1.6%), compared to 10/87 (12%) using bladder massage (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2688-1152 2688-1152 |
DOI: | 10.1002/emp2.12211 |