Development and validation of a predictive model for the prognosis in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Background This study was to conduct a predictive model for the prognosis of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and validate the clinical data. Methods A total of 235 aSAH patients were enrolled in this study, dividing into the favorable or poor prognosis groups based on Modified Rankin Scale...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical laboratory analysis 2020-12, Vol.34 (12), p.e23542-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
This study was to conduct a predictive model for the prognosis of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and validate the clinical data.
Methods
A total of 235 aSAH patients were enrolled in this study, dividing into the favorable or poor prognosis groups based on Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months postoperatively. Multivariate analysis was assessed using binary Logistic regression and Fisher discriminant analysis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the cut‐off value.
Results
Our findings showed that the high Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score 24‐hour after surgery reduced the risk of poor prognosis, and the surgical clipping and elevated neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) increased the risk of poor prognosis. The discriminant function was V = 0.881 × GCS score − 0.523 × NLR − 0.422 × therapeutic approach, and V = −0.689 served as a cut‐off value. When V ≥ −0.689, the good prognosis was considered among these patients with aSAH. The correctness for predicting the prognostic outcomes by self‐validation was 85.11%.
Conclusion
This predictive model established by a discriminant analysis is a useful tool for predicting the prognostic outcomes of aSAH patients, which may help clinicians identify patients at high risk for poor prognosis and optimize treatment after surgery.
The ROC curve was established according to V as the test value and mRS score results as the gold standard (AUC = 0.859, SE = .040, 95% CI: 0.781‐0.938) and the critical value of V (cut off) was −0.689. When V ≥ −0.689, the prognosis was considered as good, otherwise as poor |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0887-8013 1098-2825 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jcla.23542 |