Validity and Reliability of the New Portable Metabolic Analyzer PNOE

Assessment of the oxygen and carbon dioxide content of expired air during exercise is critical for determining cardiorespiratory status. The purpose of this study was to compare the new portable metabolic analyzer PNOE with COSMED - Quark CPET, a previously validated stationary metabolic cart. A tot...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in sports and active living 2019-09, Vol.1, p.24-24
Hauptverfasser: Tsekouras, Yiannis E, Tambalis, Konstantinos D, Sarras, Stavros E, Antoniou, Athanasios K, Kokkinos, Peter, Sidossis, Labros S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Assessment of the oxygen and carbon dioxide content of expired air during exercise is critical for determining cardiorespiratory status. The purpose of this study was to compare the new portable metabolic analyzer PNOE with COSMED - Quark CPET, a previously validated stationary metabolic cart. A total of 22 subjects (17 male and 5 female) aged 32.3 ± 11.1 years took part in the study. Breath by breath gas exchange was measured by both devices during a four-stage incremental protocol on a cycle ergometer. On a separate day, 10 participants repeated the trial to assess the reliability of the PNOE metabolic cart. Strong correlations were obtained in VO ( = 0.98, < 0.001), VCO ( = 0.98, < 0.001), VE ( = 0.98, < 0.001), and RQ ( = 0.91, < 0.001), between the two devices. Bland-Altman plots revealed a mean difference of 34.0 ± 118 ml/min and 36.4 ± 110 ml/min in VO and VCO analysis, respectively. There were no significant differences in VO , VCO , VE, or RQ between the two devices. Intraclass correlation coefficient was high between the two trials for VO ( = 0.98, < 0.001), VCO ( = 0.98, < 0.001), VE ( = 0.99, < 0.001), and RQ ( = 0.93, < 0.001). Our data indicate that the portable metabolic cart PNOE can accurately determine respiratory gases over a wide range of exercise intensities, in healthy individuals, in a controlled laboratory setting.
ISSN:2624-9367
2624-9367
DOI:10.3389/fspor.2019.00024