In vitro maturation with letrozole priming: Can it be a solution for patients with cancerophobia? A pilot study

To investigate whether letrozole priming could be used efficiently in patients undergoing maturation (IVM) as compared with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) priming. This is a retrospective analysis of 63 patients who underwent IVM due to the high risk of Ovarian Hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology 2020-12, Vol.17 (4), p.247-252
Hauptverfasser: Hatırnaz, Şafak, Hatırnaz, Ebru Saynur, Başbuğ, Alper, Kanat Pektaş, Mine, Erol, Onur, Dahan, Michael, Tan, Seang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To investigate whether letrozole priming could be used efficiently in patients undergoing maturation (IVM) as compared with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) priming. This is a retrospective analysis of 63 patients who underwent IVM due to the high risk of Ovarian Hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (n=39), cancerophobia (n=16), and desire for IVM after failed fertilization attempts (n=8). Forty-two patients received FSH priming and 21 patients received letrozole priming. The patients who had FSH or letrozole priming were statistically similar with respect to age, body mass index, duration of infertility, basal antral follicle count, serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels, and IVM indications (p>0.05 for all). When compared with the FSH priming group, the number of germinal vesicle oocytes, metaphase II and fertilized oocytes were significantly higher (p=0.003, p=0.001, and p=0.016, respectively), but the number of metaphase I oocytes was significantly lower in the letrozole priming group (p=0.002). The patients who received FSH and letrozole priming had statistically similar rates of implantation (33.3% vs 37.0%, p=0.709), clinical pregnancy (31.5% vs 33.3%, p=0.848), twinning (1.9% vs 3.7%, p=0.611), and live birth (24.1% vs 29.6%, p=0.682). Potential indications for IVM include patients with increased risk for OHSS and contraindication for hyperestrogenism. Aromatase inhibitors can be used to preserve the fertility of patients with estrogen-sensitive cancers. Letrozole priming appears to be an efficient approach in patients who undergo IVM, with likely less cost than FSH priming.
ISSN:2149-9322
1307-699X
2149-9330
DOI:10.4274/tjod.galenos.2020.79446