GCT-23. MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF TREATMENT MODALITIES IN BASAL GANGLIA AND THALAMIC GERMINOMA

Abstract BACKGROUND Central nervous system (CNS) germinomas are radiotherapy (RT)-sensitive tumors with excellent survival. Current treatment strategies combine chemotherapy with RT to reduce the field and dose of RT. There is no standard treatment for germinomas originating in the basal ganglia/tha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2020-12, Vol.22 (Supplement_3), p.iii332-iii332
Hauptverfasser: Graham, Richard T, Abu-Arja, Mohammad H, Stanek, Joseph, Bartels, Ute, Cappellano, Andrea, Chi, Susan, Cooney, Tabitha, Dhall, Girish, Finlay, Jonathan L, Fisher, Michael J, Friedman, Gregory, Gajjar, Amar, Gauvain, Karen, Hoffmann, Lindsey M, Hukin, Juliette, Margol, Ashley, Mueller, Sabine, Navalkele, Pournima, Ronsley, Rebecca, Villeneuve, Stephanie, Yeo, Kee Kiat, Su, Jack M, Gottardo, Nicholas G, Allen, Jeffrey, Packer, Roger, AbdelBaki, Mohamed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract BACKGROUND Central nervous system (CNS) germinomas are radiotherapy (RT)-sensitive tumors with excellent survival. Current treatment strategies combine chemotherapy with RT to reduce the field and dose of RT. There is no standard treatment for germinomas originating in the basal ganglia/thalami (BGTG) given their rarity and poorly-defined imaging characteristics. Craniospinal (CSI), whole brain (WBI), whole ventricle (WVI), and focal RT have been previously utilized; however, the optimal strategy remains unclear. METHODS Retrospective multi-institutional analysis was conducted across 18 institutions in four countries. RESULTS For 46 cases with non-metastatic BGTG, the event-free survival (EFS) was 86.9% at both 5 and 10 years, while overall survival (OS) was 100%, and 95.7% respectively at 5 and 10 years. Median RT dose and range for the various treatment volumes were as follows: CSI (n=10): 2340 cGy (1980–3060 cGy), WBI (n=8): 2340 (1800–3000 cGy), WVI (n=14): 2340 cGy (1800–2550 cGy), focal (n=9): 3600 cGy (3060–5400 cGy). There was no statistically significant difference in the EFS based on RT modality (p=0.57), but EFS for subjects with CSI and WBI were both 100%. The three subjects who received chemotherapy alone had significantly lower EFS than those who received chemotherapy and RT (p=0.001), but were salvageable with RT. CONCLUSION In the largest study to date for BGTG, there were no significant differences in outcomes between patients who received CSI, WBI, WVI or focal RT. This group of patients should be included in future prospective clinical trials, and a more limited RT field may be considered.
ISSN:1522-8517
1523-5866
DOI:10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.243