Penile cancer: a Brazilian consensus statement for low- and middle-income countries

Purpose Penile cancer is highly prevalent in low- and middle-income countries, with significant morbidity and mortality rates. The first Brazilian consensus provides support to improve penile cancer patients’ outcomes, based on expert’s opinion and evidence from medical literature. Methods Fifty-one...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2020-12, Vol.146 (12), p.3281-3296
Hauptverfasser: Soares, Andrey, de Carvalho, Icaro Thiago, da Fonseca, Aluízio Gonçalves, Alencar, Antonio Machado, Leite, Carlos Heli Bezerra, Bastos, Diogo Assed, Soares, João Paulo Holanda, Leite, Katia Ramos Moreira, Filho, Mário Ronalsa Brandão, Coelho, Ronald Wagner Pereira, Cavallero, Sandro Roberto de A., de Cassio Zequi, Stênio, de Ribamar Rodrigues Calixto, José
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Penile cancer is highly prevalent in low- and middle-income countries, with significant morbidity and mortality rates. The first Brazilian consensus provides support to improve penile cancer patients’ outcomes, based on expert’s opinion and evidence from medical literature. Methods Fifty-one Brazilian experts (clinical oncologists, radiation oncologists, urologists, and pathologists) assembled and voted 104 multiple-choice questions, confronted the results with the literature, and ranked the levels of evidence. Results Healthcare professionals need to deliver more effective communication about the risk factors for penile cancer. Staging and follow-up of patients include physical examination, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Close monitoring is crucial, because most recurrences occur in the first 2–5 years. Lymph-node involvement is the most important predictive factor for survival, and management depends on the location (inguinal or pelvic) and the number of lymph nodes involved. Conservative treatment may be helpful in selected patients without compromising oncological outcomes; however, surgery yields the lowest rate of local recurrence. Conclusion This consensus provides an essential decision-making orientation regarding this challenging disease.
ISSN:0171-5216
1432-1335
1432-1335
DOI:10.1007/s00432-020-03417-1