Spinal Anesthesia for Geriatric Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Comparative Case Series
The use of spinal anesthesia (SA) as opposed to general anesthesia (GA) during elective lumbar spine surgery is an emerging technique and represents a potentially modifiable factor to limit perioperative complications. Few studies, however, have compared these anesthetic techniques in an elderly pop...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of spine surgery 2020-10, Vol.14 (5), p.713-721 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The use of spinal anesthesia (SA) as opposed to general anesthesia (GA) during elective lumbar spine surgery is an emerging technique and represents a potentially modifiable factor to limit perioperative complications. Few studies, however, have compared these anesthetic techniques in an elderly population. The aim of this study is to determine if SA is a safe alternative to GA for lumbar spine surgery in elderly patients.
A retrospective, consecutive case series study was performed. All patients aged 70 years and older who underwent lumbar spine decompression or combined decompression and fusion using either SA or GA during a 2-year period at a single institution were identified. Demographics and perioperative outcomes were compared.
Of all patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 56 patients (19%) received SA and 239 (81%) received GA. Patients receiving SA were slightly older (median age, 77 years versus 75 years,
= .002), consisted of more men (57% versus 36%,
= .01), and had a lower mean body mass index (28.3 versus 30.1,
= .03). Indications for surgery and type of surgery were similar between groups. On average, operative times with SA were 101 minutes versus 103 minutes with GA (
= .71). After controlling for age, sex, and body mass index, patients receiving SA had decreased estimated blood loss (β = -75 mL; 95% confidence interval [CI], -140.6, -9.4;
= .025) and intraoperative intravenous fluid requirements (β = -205 mL; 95% CI, -389.4, -21.0;
= .029), shorter postanesthesia care unit stays (β = -41 minutes; 95% CI, -64.6, -16.9;
= .001), lower maximum visual analog scale pain scores (β = -0.89 points; 95% CI, -1.6, -0.1;
= .020), and decreased odds of receiving blood transfusion (odds ratio, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.01, 0.62;
= .45); there were no significant differences in operative time, length of stay, nausea, or oral morphine equivalents consumed per day. Complication rates were similar between groups.
Spinal anesthesia is a reasonable, safe alternative to general anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery in elderly patients with degenerative conditions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2211-4599 2211-4599 |
DOI: | 10.14444/7103 |