Radioactive Seed Versus Wire-Guided Localization for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast: Comparable Resection Margins

Background There are currently two widely used methods for preoperative localization of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast: wire-guided localization (WGL) and radioactive seed localization (RSL). Several studies compared these localization techniques in small cohorts. Objective The aim of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2020-12, Vol.27 (13), p.5296-5302
Hauptverfasser: Agahozo, Marie Colombe, Berghuis, Sofie A.M., van den Broek, Esther, Koppert, Linetta B., Obdeijn, Inge-Marie, van Deurzen, Carolien H. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background There are currently two widely used methods for preoperative localization of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast: wire-guided localization (WGL) and radioactive seed localization (RSL). Several studies compared these localization techniques in small cohorts. Objective The aim of this study was to compare the surgical resection margin status between RSL and WGL in a large national cohort of patients with DCIS. Patients and Methods We included patients from the Dutch Pathology Registry who underwent breast-conserving surgery for DCIS by either RSL ( n  = 1851) or WGL ( n  = 2187) between 2009 and 2019. Several clinicopathological characteristics were compared between these two groups, including resection margin status and number of re-excisions. Results Patients undergoing RSL were younger ( p  = 0.014) and were more often diagnosed with a large DCIS ( p  = 0.013), high grade DCIS ( p  
ISSN:1068-9265
1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-020-08744-8