Radioactive Seed Versus Wire-Guided Localization for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast: Comparable Resection Margins
Background There are currently two widely used methods for preoperative localization of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast: wire-guided localization (WGL) and radioactive seed localization (RSL). Several studies compared these localization techniques in small cohorts. Objective The aim of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2020-12, Vol.27 (13), p.5296-5302 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
There are currently two widely used methods for preoperative localization of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast: wire-guided localization (WGL) and radioactive seed localization (RSL). Several studies compared these localization techniques in small cohorts.
Objective
The aim of this study was to compare the surgical resection margin status between RSL and WGL in a large national cohort of patients with DCIS.
Patients and Methods
We included patients from the Dutch Pathology Registry who underwent breast-conserving surgery for DCIS by either RSL (
n
= 1851) or WGL (
n
= 2187) between 2009 and 2019. Several clinicopathological characteristics were compared between these two groups, including resection margin status and number of re-excisions.
Results
Patients undergoing RSL were younger (
p
= 0.014) and were more often diagnosed with a large DCIS (
p
= 0.013), high grade DCIS (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1068-9265 1534-4681 |
DOI: | 10.1245/s10434-020-08744-8 |