Chest CT in the emergency department for suspected COVID-19 pneumonia

Purpose In overwhelmed emergency departments (EDs) facing COVID-19 outbreak, a swift diagnosis is imperative. CT role was widely debated for its limited specificity. Here we report the diagnostic role of CT in two EDs in Lombardy, epicenter of Italian outbreak. Material and methods Admitting chest C...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiologia medica 2021-03, Vol.126 (3), p.498-502
Hauptverfasser: Palmisano, Anna, Scotti, Giulia Maria, Ippolito, Davide, Morelli, Marco J., Vignale, Davide, Gandola, Davide, Sironi, Sandro, De Cobelli, Francesco, Ferrante, Luca, Spessot, Marzia, Tonon, Giovanni, Tacchetti, Carlo, Esposito, Antonio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose In overwhelmed emergency departments (EDs) facing COVID-19 outbreak, a swift diagnosis is imperative. CT role was widely debated for its limited specificity. Here we report the diagnostic role of CT in two EDs in Lombardy, epicenter of Italian outbreak. Material and methods Admitting chest CT from 142 consecutive patients with suspected COVID-19 were retrospectively analyzed. CT scans were classified in “highly likely,” “likely,” and “unlikely” COVID-19 pneumonia according to the presence of typical, indeterminate, and atypical findings, or “negative” in the absence of findings, or “alternative diagnosis” when a different diagnosis was found. Nasopharyngeal swab results, turnaround time, and time to positive results were collected. CT diagnostic performances were assessed considering RT-PCR as reference standard. Results Most of cases (96/142, 68%) were classified as “highly likely” COVID-19 pneumonia. Ten (7%) and seven (5%) patients were classified as “likely” and “unlikely” COVID-19 pneumonia, respectively. In 21 (15%) patients a differential diagnosis was provided, including typical pneumonia, pulmonary edema, neoplasia, and pulmonary embolism. CT was negative in 8/142 (6%) patients. Mean turnaround time for the first COVID-19 RT-PCR was 30 ± 13 h. CT diagnostic accuracy in respect of the first test swab was 79% and increased to 91.5% after repeated swabs and/or BAL, for 18 false-negative first swab. CT performance was good with 76% specificity, 99% sensitivity, 90% positive predictive value and 97% negative predictive value. Conclusion Chest CT was useful to streamline patients’ triage while waiting for RT-PCR in the ED, supporting the clinical suspicion of COVID-19 or providing alternative diagnosis.
ISSN:0033-8362
1826-6983
1826-6983
DOI:10.1007/s11547-020-01302-y