Long standing Idiopathic gingival hyperplasia of oral cavity with invasion of maxillary sinus: A rare case report
•It is a rare case study of a patient suffering from long standing oral cavity idiopathic gingival hyperplasia with maxillary sinus invasion that does not respond to traditional methods of treatment.•In order to restore the function, enhance the cosmetic appearance and quality of life of the patient...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of surgery case reports 2020-01, Vol.77, p.62-66 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •It is a rare case study of a patient suffering from long standing oral cavity idiopathic gingival hyperplasia with maxillary sinus invasion that does not respond to traditional methods of treatment.•In order to restore the function, enhance the cosmetic appearance and quality of life of the patient, surgical intervention is also required to correct the various pathologies affecting the patients.•This paper highlights the surgical method embraced to dispose of the pathology influencing the patient and progressing the generally wellbeing of the persistent.•The management of our patient highlights the need for an early visual recognition and evaluation approach that is multidisciplinary, multi factorial and multi-faceted.
Idiopathic gingival hyperplasia is a rare entity (about one in 1,75,000 individuals). It is characterized by a slow progressive benign enlargement, affecting the attached gingiva, marginal gingiva, and interdental papilla.
This case report highlights the management of an unusual case of long standing idiopathic gingival hyperplasia involving the right maxillary sinus.
Management of gingival hyperplasia depends on the severity of the condition. In this case, surgical excision was performed in both the arches, that resulted in the creation of an oroantral communication, which was protected with a prefabricated custom-made acrylic stent. Despite having a visible raw area of epithelialization evident on the 2nd post operative day, there were no significant signs of recurrence even at a follow-up of 2 years post surgery. Many authors advocate extraction of involved teeth, in addition to the gingival excision, in the presumption of a permanent cure.
The patient was satisfied with the resultant esthetic and functional outcome of the treatment. But, the possibility of recurrence cannot be ruled out, so the patient should be kept under close observation. She may also require subsequent surgeries, thus making psychological counseling mandatory. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2210-2612 2210-2612 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.10.084 |