Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications
•Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications.•Digital PCR would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers.•Real-time reverse-transcriptase (RT)-PCR is a fast and conve...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinica chimica acta 2020-12, Vol.511, p.346-351 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 351 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 346 |
container_title | Clinica chimica acta |
container_volume | 511 |
creator | Jiang, Yanfang Wang, Haifeng Hao, Sijia Chen, Yukun He, Jiaxue Liu, Yong Chen, Liguo Yu, Yuanhua Hua, Shucheng |
description | •Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications.•Digital PCR would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers.•Real-time reverse-transcriptase (RT)-PCR is a fast and convenient method for viral nucleic acid detection, but it’s results can be compromised by numerous factors and can yield false-negative results.
The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed great challenges in people’s daily lives. Highly sensitive laboratory techniques played a critical role in clinical COVID-19 diagnosis and management. In this study the feasibility of using a new digital PCR-based detection assay for clinical COVID-19 diagnosis was investigated by comparing its performance with that of RT-PCR. Clinical patient samples and samples obtained from potentially contaminated environments were analyzed. The study included 10 patients with confirmed COVID-19 diagnoses, 32 validated samples of various types derived from different clinical timepoints and sites, and 148 environmentally derived samples. SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids were more readily detected in respiratory tract samples (35.0%). In analyses of environmentally derived samples, the positivity rate of air samples was higher than that of surface samples, probably due to differences in virus concentrations. Digital PCR detected SARS–CoV–2 in several samples that had previously been deemed negative, including 3 patient-derived samples and 5 environmentally derived samples. In this study digital PCR exhibited higher sensitivity than conventional RT-PCR, suggesting that it may be a useful new method for clinical SARS-CoV-2 detection. Improvement of SARS-CoV-2 detection would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cca.2020.10.032 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7641518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0009898120305143</els_id><sourcerecordid>2458722213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-b33445af9de730559a71396f5953fded83134cc0890b9706663d058f67cc7b333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1PGzEQtaqiEmh_QC-Vj1w2-GO9u1alSigtH1IkELQ99GI53lmYaGMHexPEv8erAIJLT_bMvPfm4xHylbMpZ7w6Xk6ds1PBxBhPmRQfyIQ3tSxkqcVHMmGM6aLRDd8nByktc1iyin8i-1JypbWSE_LvJ97iYHt6NbummKilCXzCAbdAPTzQAdydx_sN0C5EenNyfVPMwt9C0BZyacDgKXrqevTosopdr_v8GfPpM9nrbJ_gy_N7SP6c_vo9Oy_ml2cXs5N54UrFh2IhZVkq2-kWasmU0rbmUledyvN1LbSN5LJ0jjWaLXTNqqqSLVNNV9XO1ZksD8mPne56s1hB68AP0fZmHXFl46MJFs37isc7cxu2pq5KrniTBY6eBWLIm6bBrDA56HvrIWySEaVqaiEEH3vxHdTFkFKE7rUNZ2b0xCxN9sSMnoyp7EnmfHs73yvjxYQM-L4DQL7SFiGa5BC8gxZjvrFpA_5H_gmqqJvL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2458722213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jiang, Yanfang ; Wang, Haifeng ; Hao, Sijia ; Chen, Yukun ; He, Jiaxue ; Liu, Yong ; Chen, Liguo ; Yu, Yuanhua ; Hua, Shucheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Yanfang ; Wang, Haifeng ; Hao, Sijia ; Chen, Yukun ; He, Jiaxue ; Liu, Yong ; Chen, Liguo ; Yu, Yuanhua ; Hua, Shucheng</creatorcontrib><description>•Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications.•Digital PCR would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers.•Real-time reverse-transcriptase (RT)-PCR is a fast and convenient method for viral nucleic acid detection, but it’s results can be compromised by numerous factors and can yield false-negative results.
The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed great challenges in people’s daily lives. Highly sensitive laboratory techniques played a critical role in clinical COVID-19 diagnosis and management. In this study the feasibility of using a new digital PCR-based detection assay for clinical COVID-19 diagnosis was investigated by comparing its performance with that of RT-PCR. Clinical patient samples and samples obtained from potentially contaminated environments were analyzed. The study included 10 patients with confirmed COVID-19 diagnoses, 32 validated samples of various types derived from different clinical timepoints and sites, and 148 environmentally derived samples. SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids were more readily detected in respiratory tract samples (35.0%). In analyses of environmentally derived samples, the positivity rate of air samples was higher than that of surface samples, probably due to differences in virus concentrations. Digital PCR detected SARS–CoV–2 in several samples that had previously been deemed negative, including 3 patient-derived samples and 5 environmentally derived samples. In this study digital PCR exhibited higher sensitivity than conventional RT-PCR, suggesting that it may be a useful new method for clinical SARS-CoV-2 detection. Improvement of SARS-CoV-2 detection would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-8981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3492</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.10.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33159953</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Asymptomatic carrier ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - diagnostic imaging ; COVID-19 - genetics ; Digital PCR ; Digital Technology - standards ; Digital Technology - trends ; False-negative results ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - trends ; Reproducibility of Results ; RT-PCR ; SARS-CoV-2 ; SARS-CoV-2 - genetics ; SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification</subject><ispartof>Clinica chimica acta, 2020-12, Vol.511, p.346-351</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-b33445af9de730559a71396f5953fded83134cc0890b9706663d058f67cc7b333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-b33445af9de730559a71396f5953fded83134cc0890b9706663d058f67cc7b333</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4349-746X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009898120305143$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33159953$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Yanfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Haifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Sijia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yukun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Jiaxue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Liguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yuanhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hua, Shucheng</creatorcontrib><title>Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications</title><title>Clinica chimica acta</title><addtitle>Clin Chim Acta</addtitle><description>•Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications.•Digital PCR would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers.•Real-time reverse-transcriptase (RT)-PCR is a fast and convenient method for viral nucleic acid detection, but it’s results can be compromised by numerous factors and can yield false-negative results.
The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed great challenges in people’s daily lives. Highly sensitive laboratory techniques played a critical role in clinical COVID-19 diagnosis and management. In this study the feasibility of using a new digital PCR-based detection assay for clinical COVID-19 diagnosis was investigated by comparing its performance with that of RT-PCR. Clinical patient samples and samples obtained from potentially contaminated environments were analyzed. The study included 10 patients with confirmed COVID-19 diagnoses, 32 validated samples of various types derived from different clinical timepoints and sites, and 148 environmentally derived samples. SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids were more readily detected in respiratory tract samples (35.0%). In analyses of environmentally derived samples, the positivity rate of air samples was higher than that of surface samples, probably due to differences in virus concentrations. Digital PCR detected SARS–CoV–2 in several samples that had previously been deemed negative, including 3 patient-derived samples and 5 environmentally derived samples. In this study digital PCR exhibited higher sensitivity than conventional RT-PCR, suggesting that it may be a useful new method for clinical SARS-CoV-2 detection. Improvement of SARS-CoV-2 detection would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Asymptomatic carrier</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>COVID-19 - genetics</subject><subject>Digital PCR</subject><subject>Digital Technology - standards</subject><subject>Digital Technology - trends</subject><subject>False-negative results</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - trends</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>RT-PCR</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - genetics</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification</subject><issn>0009-8981</issn><issn>1873-3492</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1PGzEQtaqiEmh_QC-Vj1w2-GO9u1alSigtH1IkELQ99GI53lmYaGMHexPEv8erAIJLT_bMvPfm4xHylbMpZ7w6Xk6ds1PBxBhPmRQfyIQ3tSxkqcVHMmGM6aLRDd8nByktc1iyin8i-1JypbWSE_LvJ97iYHt6NbummKilCXzCAbdAPTzQAdydx_sN0C5EenNyfVPMwt9C0BZyacDgKXrqevTosopdr_v8GfPpM9nrbJ_gy_N7SP6c_vo9Oy_ml2cXs5N54UrFh2IhZVkq2-kWasmU0rbmUledyvN1LbSN5LJ0jjWaLXTNqqqSLVNNV9XO1ZksD8mPne56s1hB68AP0fZmHXFl46MJFs37isc7cxu2pq5KrniTBY6eBWLIm6bBrDA56HvrIWySEaVqaiEEH3vxHdTFkFKE7rUNZ2b0xCxN9sSMnoyp7EnmfHs73yvjxYQM-L4DQL7SFiGa5BC8gxZjvrFpA_5H_gmqqJvL</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Jiang, Yanfang</creator><creator>Wang, Haifeng</creator><creator>Hao, Sijia</creator><creator>Chen, Yukun</creator><creator>He, Jiaxue</creator><creator>Liu, Yong</creator><creator>Chen, Liguo</creator><creator>Yu, Yuanhua</creator><creator>Hua, Shucheng</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4349-746X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications</title><author>Jiang, Yanfang ; Wang, Haifeng ; Hao, Sijia ; Chen, Yukun ; He, Jiaxue ; Liu, Yong ; Chen, Liguo ; Yu, Yuanhua ; Hua, Shucheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-b33445af9de730559a71396f5953fded83134cc0890b9706663d058f67cc7b333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Asymptomatic carrier</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>COVID-19 - genetics</topic><topic>Digital PCR</topic><topic>Digital Technology - standards</topic><topic>Digital Technology - trends</topic><topic>False-negative results</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - trends</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>RT-PCR</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - genetics</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Yanfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Haifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Sijia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yukun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Jiaxue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Liguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yuanhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hua, Shucheng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinica chimica acta</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jiang, Yanfang</au><au>Wang, Haifeng</au><au>Hao, Sijia</au><au>Chen, Yukun</au><au>He, Jiaxue</au><au>Liu, Yong</au><au>Chen, Liguo</au><au>Yu, Yuanhua</au><au>Hua, Shucheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications</atitle><jtitle>Clinica chimica acta</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Chim Acta</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>511</volume><spage>346</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>346-351</pages><issn>0009-8981</issn><eissn>1873-3492</eissn><abstract>•Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications.•Digital PCR would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers.•Real-time reverse-transcriptase (RT)-PCR is a fast and convenient method for viral nucleic acid detection, but it’s results can be compromised by numerous factors and can yield false-negative results.
The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed great challenges in people’s daily lives. Highly sensitive laboratory techniques played a critical role in clinical COVID-19 diagnosis and management. In this study the feasibility of using a new digital PCR-based detection assay for clinical COVID-19 diagnosis was investigated by comparing its performance with that of RT-PCR. Clinical patient samples and samples obtained from potentially contaminated environments were analyzed. The study included 10 patients with confirmed COVID-19 diagnoses, 32 validated samples of various types derived from different clinical timepoints and sites, and 148 environmentally derived samples. SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids were more readily detected in respiratory tract samples (35.0%). In analyses of environmentally derived samples, the positivity rate of air samples was higher than that of surface samples, probably due to differences in virus concentrations. Digital PCR detected SARS–CoV–2 in several samples that had previously been deemed negative, including 3 patient-derived samples and 5 environmentally derived samples. In this study digital PCR exhibited higher sensitivity than conventional RT-PCR, suggesting that it may be a useful new method for clinical SARS-CoV-2 detection. Improvement of SARS-CoV-2 detection would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33159953</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cca.2020.10.032</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4349-746X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-8981 |
ispartof | Clinica chimica acta, 2020-12, Vol.511, p.346-351 |
issn | 0009-8981 1873-3492 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7641518 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Asymptomatic carrier COVID-19 COVID-19 - diagnostic imaging COVID-19 - genetics Digital PCR Digital Technology - standards Digital Technology - trends False-negative results Female Humans Male Middle Aged Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - trends Reproducibility of Results RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 SARS-CoV-2 - genetics SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification |
title | Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T22%3A35%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Digital%20PCR%20is%20a%20sensitive%20new%20technique%20for%20SARS-CoV-2%20detection%20in%20clinical%20applications&rft.jtitle=Clinica%20chimica%20acta&rft.au=Jiang,%20Yanfang&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=511&rft.spage=346&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=346-351&rft.issn=0009-8981&rft.eissn=1873-3492&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cca.2020.10.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2458722213%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2458722213&rft_id=info:pmid/33159953&rft_els_id=S0009898120305143&rfr_iscdi=true |