Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications

•Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications.•Digital PCR would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers.•Real-time reverse-transcriptase (RT)-PCR is a fast and conve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinica chimica acta 2020-12, Vol.511, p.346-351
Hauptverfasser: Jiang, Yanfang, Wang, Haifeng, Hao, Sijia, Chen, Yukun, He, Jiaxue, Liu, Yong, Chen, Liguo, Yu, Yuanhua, Hua, Shucheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 351
container_issue
container_start_page 346
container_title Clinica chimica acta
container_volume 511
creator Jiang, Yanfang
Wang, Haifeng
Hao, Sijia
Chen, Yukun
He, Jiaxue
Liu, Yong
Chen, Liguo
Yu, Yuanhua
Hua, Shucheng
description •Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications.•Digital PCR would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers.•Real-time reverse-transcriptase (RT)-PCR is a fast and convenient method for viral nucleic acid detection, but it’s results can be compromised by numerous factors and can yield false-negative results. The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed great challenges in people’s daily lives. Highly sensitive laboratory techniques played a critical role in clinical COVID-19 diagnosis and management. In this study the feasibility of using a new digital PCR-based detection assay for clinical COVID-19 diagnosis was investigated by comparing its performance with that of RT-PCR. Clinical patient samples and samples obtained from potentially contaminated environments were analyzed. The study included 10 patients with confirmed COVID-19 diagnoses, 32 validated samples of various types derived from different clinical timepoints and sites, and 148 environmentally derived samples. SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids were more readily detected in respiratory tract samples (35.0%). In analyses of environmentally derived samples, the positivity rate of air samples was higher than that of surface samples, probably due to differences in virus concentrations. Digital PCR detected SARS–CoV–2 in several samples that had previously been deemed negative, including 3 patient-derived samples and 5 environmentally derived samples. In this study digital PCR exhibited higher sensitivity than conventional RT-PCR, suggesting that it may be a useful new method for clinical SARS-CoV-2 detection. Improvement of SARS-CoV-2 detection would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cca.2020.10.032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7641518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0009898120305143</els_id><sourcerecordid>2458722213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-b33445af9de730559a71396f5953fded83134cc0890b9706663d058f67cc7b333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1PGzEQtaqiEmh_QC-Vj1w2-GO9u1alSigtH1IkELQ99GI53lmYaGMHexPEv8erAIJLT_bMvPfm4xHylbMpZ7w6Xk6ds1PBxBhPmRQfyIQ3tSxkqcVHMmGM6aLRDd8nByktc1iyin8i-1JypbWSE_LvJ97iYHt6NbummKilCXzCAbdAPTzQAdydx_sN0C5EenNyfVPMwt9C0BZyacDgKXrqevTosopdr_v8GfPpM9nrbJ_gy_N7SP6c_vo9Oy_ml2cXs5N54UrFh2IhZVkq2-kWasmU0rbmUledyvN1LbSN5LJ0jjWaLXTNqqqSLVNNV9XO1ZksD8mPne56s1hB68AP0fZmHXFl46MJFs37isc7cxu2pq5KrniTBY6eBWLIm6bBrDA56HvrIWySEaVqaiEEH3vxHdTFkFKE7rUNZ2b0xCxN9sSMnoyp7EnmfHs73yvjxYQM-L4DQL7SFiGa5BC8gxZjvrFpA_5H_gmqqJvL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2458722213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jiang, Yanfang ; Wang, Haifeng ; Hao, Sijia ; Chen, Yukun ; He, Jiaxue ; Liu, Yong ; Chen, Liguo ; Yu, Yuanhua ; Hua, Shucheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Yanfang ; Wang, Haifeng ; Hao, Sijia ; Chen, Yukun ; He, Jiaxue ; Liu, Yong ; Chen, Liguo ; Yu, Yuanhua ; Hua, Shucheng</creatorcontrib><description>•Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications.•Digital PCR would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers.•Real-time reverse-transcriptase (RT)-PCR is a fast and convenient method for viral nucleic acid detection, but it’s results can be compromised by numerous factors and can yield false-negative results. The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed great challenges in people’s daily lives. Highly sensitive laboratory techniques played a critical role in clinical COVID-19 diagnosis and management. In this study the feasibility of using a new digital PCR-based detection assay for clinical COVID-19 diagnosis was investigated by comparing its performance with that of RT-PCR. Clinical patient samples and samples obtained from potentially contaminated environments were analyzed. The study included 10 patients with confirmed COVID-19 diagnoses, 32 validated samples of various types derived from different clinical timepoints and sites, and 148 environmentally derived samples. SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids were more readily detected in respiratory tract samples (35.0%). In analyses of environmentally derived samples, the positivity rate of air samples was higher than that of surface samples, probably due to differences in virus concentrations. Digital PCR detected SARS–CoV–2 in several samples that had previously been deemed negative, including 3 patient-derived samples and 5 environmentally derived samples. In this study digital PCR exhibited higher sensitivity than conventional RT-PCR, suggesting that it may be a useful new method for clinical SARS-CoV-2 detection. Improvement of SARS-CoV-2 detection would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-8981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3492</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.10.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33159953</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Asymptomatic carrier ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - diagnostic imaging ; COVID-19 - genetics ; Digital PCR ; Digital Technology - standards ; Digital Technology - trends ; False-negative results ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - trends ; Reproducibility of Results ; RT-PCR ; SARS-CoV-2 ; SARS-CoV-2 - genetics ; SARS-CoV-2 - isolation &amp; purification</subject><ispartof>Clinica chimica acta, 2020-12, Vol.511, p.346-351</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-b33445af9de730559a71396f5953fded83134cc0890b9706663d058f67cc7b333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-b33445af9de730559a71396f5953fded83134cc0890b9706663d058f67cc7b333</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4349-746X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009898120305143$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33159953$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Yanfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Haifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Sijia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yukun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Jiaxue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Liguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yuanhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hua, Shucheng</creatorcontrib><title>Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications</title><title>Clinica chimica acta</title><addtitle>Clin Chim Acta</addtitle><description>•Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications.•Digital PCR would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers.•Real-time reverse-transcriptase (RT)-PCR is a fast and convenient method for viral nucleic acid detection, but it’s results can be compromised by numerous factors and can yield false-negative results. The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed great challenges in people’s daily lives. Highly sensitive laboratory techniques played a critical role in clinical COVID-19 diagnosis and management. In this study the feasibility of using a new digital PCR-based detection assay for clinical COVID-19 diagnosis was investigated by comparing its performance with that of RT-PCR. Clinical patient samples and samples obtained from potentially contaminated environments were analyzed. The study included 10 patients with confirmed COVID-19 diagnoses, 32 validated samples of various types derived from different clinical timepoints and sites, and 148 environmentally derived samples. SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids were more readily detected in respiratory tract samples (35.0%). In analyses of environmentally derived samples, the positivity rate of air samples was higher than that of surface samples, probably due to differences in virus concentrations. Digital PCR detected SARS–CoV–2 in several samples that had previously been deemed negative, including 3 patient-derived samples and 5 environmentally derived samples. In this study digital PCR exhibited higher sensitivity than conventional RT-PCR, suggesting that it may be a useful new method for clinical SARS-CoV-2 detection. Improvement of SARS-CoV-2 detection would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Asymptomatic carrier</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>COVID-19 - genetics</subject><subject>Digital PCR</subject><subject>Digital Technology - standards</subject><subject>Digital Technology - trends</subject><subject>False-negative results</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - trends</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>RT-PCR</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - genetics</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation &amp; purification</subject><issn>0009-8981</issn><issn>1873-3492</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1PGzEQtaqiEmh_QC-Vj1w2-GO9u1alSigtH1IkELQ99GI53lmYaGMHexPEv8erAIJLT_bMvPfm4xHylbMpZ7w6Xk6ds1PBxBhPmRQfyIQ3tSxkqcVHMmGM6aLRDd8nByktc1iyin8i-1JypbWSE_LvJ97iYHt6NbummKilCXzCAbdAPTzQAdydx_sN0C5EenNyfVPMwt9C0BZyacDgKXrqevTosopdr_v8GfPpM9nrbJ_gy_N7SP6c_vo9Oy_ml2cXs5N54UrFh2IhZVkq2-kWasmU0rbmUledyvN1LbSN5LJ0jjWaLXTNqqqSLVNNV9XO1ZksD8mPne56s1hB68AP0fZmHXFl46MJFs37isc7cxu2pq5KrniTBY6eBWLIm6bBrDA56HvrIWySEaVqaiEEH3vxHdTFkFKE7rUNZ2b0xCxN9sSMnoyp7EnmfHs73yvjxYQM-L4DQL7SFiGa5BC8gxZjvrFpA_5H_gmqqJvL</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Jiang, Yanfang</creator><creator>Wang, Haifeng</creator><creator>Hao, Sijia</creator><creator>Chen, Yukun</creator><creator>He, Jiaxue</creator><creator>Liu, Yong</creator><creator>Chen, Liguo</creator><creator>Yu, Yuanhua</creator><creator>Hua, Shucheng</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4349-746X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications</title><author>Jiang, Yanfang ; Wang, Haifeng ; Hao, Sijia ; Chen, Yukun ; He, Jiaxue ; Liu, Yong ; Chen, Liguo ; Yu, Yuanhua ; Hua, Shucheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-b33445af9de730559a71396f5953fded83134cc0890b9706663d058f67cc7b333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Asymptomatic carrier</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>COVID-19 - genetics</topic><topic>Digital PCR</topic><topic>Digital Technology - standards</topic><topic>Digital Technology - trends</topic><topic>False-negative results</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - trends</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>RT-PCR</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - genetics</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation &amp; purification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Yanfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Haifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Sijia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yukun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Jiaxue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Liguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Yuanhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hua, Shucheng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinica chimica acta</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jiang, Yanfang</au><au>Wang, Haifeng</au><au>Hao, Sijia</au><au>Chen, Yukun</au><au>He, Jiaxue</au><au>Liu, Yong</au><au>Chen, Liguo</au><au>Yu, Yuanhua</au><au>Hua, Shucheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications</atitle><jtitle>Clinica chimica acta</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Chim Acta</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>511</volume><spage>346</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>346-351</pages><issn>0009-8981</issn><eissn>1873-3492</eissn><abstract>•Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications.•Digital PCR would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers.•Real-time reverse-transcriptase (RT)-PCR is a fast and convenient method for viral nucleic acid detection, but it’s results can be compromised by numerous factors and can yield false-negative results. The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed great challenges in people’s daily lives. Highly sensitive laboratory techniques played a critical role in clinical COVID-19 diagnosis and management. In this study the feasibility of using a new digital PCR-based detection assay for clinical COVID-19 diagnosis was investigated by comparing its performance with that of RT-PCR. Clinical patient samples and samples obtained from potentially contaminated environments were analyzed. The study included 10 patients with confirmed COVID-19 diagnoses, 32 validated samples of various types derived from different clinical timepoints and sites, and 148 environmentally derived samples. SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids were more readily detected in respiratory tract samples (35.0%). In analyses of environmentally derived samples, the positivity rate of air samples was higher than that of surface samples, probably due to differences in virus concentrations. Digital PCR detected SARS–CoV–2 in several samples that had previously been deemed negative, including 3 patient-derived samples and 5 environmentally derived samples. In this study digital PCR exhibited higher sensitivity than conventional RT-PCR, suggesting that it may be a useful new method for clinical SARS-CoV-2 detection. Improvement of SARS-CoV-2 detection would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33159953</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cca.2020.10.032</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4349-746X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-8981
ispartof Clinica chimica acta, 2020-12, Vol.511, p.346-351
issn 0009-8981
1873-3492
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7641518
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Asymptomatic carrier
COVID-19
COVID-19 - diagnostic imaging
COVID-19 - genetics
Digital PCR
Digital Technology - standards
Digital Technology - trends
False-negative results
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - standards
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction - trends
Reproducibility of Results
RT-PCR
SARS-CoV-2
SARS-CoV-2 - genetics
SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification
title Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T22%3A35%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Digital%20PCR%20is%20a%20sensitive%20new%20technique%20for%20SARS-CoV-2%20detection%20in%20clinical%20applications&rft.jtitle=Clinica%20chimica%20acta&rft.au=Jiang,%20Yanfang&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=511&rft.spage=346&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=346-351&rft.issn=0009-8981&rft.eissn=1873-3492&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cca.2020.10.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2458722213%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2458722213&rft_id=info:pmid/33159953&rft_els_id=S0009898120305143&rfr_iscdi=true