Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications

•Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications.•Digital PCR would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers.•Real-time reverse-transcriptase (RT)-PCR is a fast and conve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinica chimica acta 2020-12, Vol.511, p.346-351
Hauptverfasser: Jiang, Yanfang, Wang, Haifeng, Hao, Sijia, Chen, Yukun, He, Jiaxue, Liu, Yong, Chen, Liguo, Yu, Yuanhua, Hua, Shucheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Digital PCR is a sensitive new technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical applications.•Digital PCR would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers.•Real-time reverse-transcriptase (RT)-PCR is a fast and convenient method for viral nucleic acid detection, but it’s results can be compromised by numerous factors and can yield false-negative results. The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed great challenges in people’s daily lives. Highly sensitive laboratory techniques played a critical role in clinical COVID-19 diagnosis and management. In this study the feasibility of using a new digital PCR-based detection assay for clinical COVID-19 diagnosis was investigated by comparing its performance with that of RT-PCR. Clinical patient samples and samples obtained from potentially contaminated environments were analyzed. The study included 10 patients with confirmed COVID-19 diagnoses, 32 validated samples of various types derived from different clinical timepoints and sites, and 148 environmentally derived samples. SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids were more readily detected in respiratory tract samples (35.0%). In analyses of environmentally derived samples, the positivity rate of air samples was higher than that of surface samples, probably due to differences in virus concentrations. Digital PCR detected SARS–CoV–2 in several samples that had previously been deemed negative, including 3 patient-derived samples and 5 environmentally derived samples. In this study digital PCR exhibited higher sensitivity than conventional RT-PCR, suggesting that it may be a useful new method for clinical SARS-CoV-2 detection. Improvement of SARS-CoV-2 detection would substantially reduce the rates of false-negative COVID-19 test results, in particular those pertaining to asymptomatic carriers.
ISSN:0009-8981
1873-3492
DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2020.10.032