Shortfalls of funding for general practice in deprived areas
Castle et al discuss the shortfalls of funding for general practice in deprived areas. In April 2019, the Haxby Group, through a contract tender process, acquired two surgeries in a deprived area of Hull, Yorkshire. These are specifically located in Calvert and Newington with approximately 10,000 pa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of general practice 2020-11, Vol.70 (700), p.559-560 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Castle et al discuss the shortfalls of funding for general practice in deprived areas. In April 2019, the Haxby Group, through a contract tender process, acquired two surgeries in a deprived area of Hull, Yorkshire. These are specifically located in Calvert and Newington with approximately 10,000 patients. This, in addition to six sites in York and three other sites in Hull, with centralized administrative services, make up the Haxby Group. The transformative process that has followed has highlighted many positive outcomes from the use of at-scale general practice and diversifying the workforce but has become increasingly hindered by funding deficits. In particular, the use of the Carr-Hill formula and Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF)-driven payments negatively impact a practice's ability to provide appropriate care in deprived populations. The population served by this new contract is predominantly young. The area, like most of Hull, is especially high on the Index of Multiple Deprivation, scoring 43.7, compared with 28.1 at another Haxby practice in Hull and 10.4 in York. As is often seen in deprived areas, there is a high incidence of drug and alcohol misuse plus mental health problems. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0960-1643 1478-5242 |
DOI: | 10.3399/bjgp20X713357 |