Disinfection of 3D-printed protective face shield during COVID-19 pandemic
•This study evaluated the face shields obtained by 3D-Printing technology, test chemical disinfectants 70% ethanol; H2O2-quaternary ammonium salt mixture; 0.1% sodium hypochlorite and autoclaving to disinfecting the models and to assess the comfort, visibility and feasibility on real life.•All desig...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of infection control 2021-04, Vol.49 (4), p.512-515 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •This study evaluated the face shields obtained by 3D-Printing technology, test chemical disinfectants 70% ethanol; H2O2-quaternary ammonium salt mixture; 0.1% sodium hypochlorite and autoclaving to disinfecting the models and to assess the comfort, visibility and feasibility on real life.•All designs were considered suitable, and there was no important difference between them.•Disinfection was done 40 times on each type of mask without physical damage. On the other hand, autoclaving was not useful and led to important face shield physical damage.
This study assessed the disinfection using 70% ethanol; H2O2-quaternary ammonium salt mixture; 0.1% sodium hypochlorite and autoclaving of four 3D-printed face shields with different designs, visor materials; and visor thickness (0.5-0.75 mm). We also investigated their clinical suitability by applying a questionnaire to health workers (HW) who used them.
Each type of disinfection was done 40 times on each type of mask without physical damage. In contrast, autoclaving led to appreciable damage. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0196-6553 1527-3296 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.10.008 |