Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine for COVID‐19: Perspectives on their failure in repurposing

What is known and Objective Non‐clinical studies suggest that chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have antiviral activities. Early clinical reports of successful HCQ‐associated reduction in viral load from small studies in COVID‐19 patients spurred a large number of national and international clinical trials to test their therapeutic potential. The objective of this review is to summarize the current evidence on the safety and efficacy of these two agents and to provide a perspective on why their repurposing has hitherto failed. Methods Published studies and rapidly emerging data were reviewed to gather evidence on safety and efficacy of CQ and HCQ in patients with COVID‐19 infection or as prophylaxis. The focus is on clinically relevant efficacy endpoints and their adverse effects on QT interval. Results and Discussion At the doses used, the two agents, given alone or with azithromycin (AZM), are not effective in COVID‐19 infection. The choice of (typically subtherapeutic) dosing regimens, influenced partly by "QT‐phobia," varied widely and seems anecdotal without any pharmacologically reliable supporting clinical evidence. A substantial proportion of patients receiving CQ/HCQ/AZM regimen developed QTc interval prolongation, many with absolute QTc interval exceeding the potential proarrhythmic threshold, but very few developed proarrhythmia. What is new and Conclusion The strategy to repurpose CQ/HCQ to combat COVID‐19 infection is overshadowed by concerns about their QT liability, resulting in choice of potentially subtherapeutic doses. Although the risk of QT‐related proarrhythmia is real, it is low and manageable by careful monitoring. Recent discontinuation of HCQ from at least four large studies effectively marks the end of efforts at repurposing of CQ or HCQ for COVID‐19 infection. This episode leaves behind important questions on dose selection and risk/benefit balance in repurposing drugs generally.